For every question, there's an answer -- and you'll find it here!


Printer-friendly copy
Top The PC Q&A Forum Off-Topic Lounge topic #12966
View in linear mode

Subject: "Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan" Previous topic | Next topic
shadywillowTue Jan-14-03 06:13 PM
Member since Aug 19th 2002
74 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"


          

Because I am used to our media keeping things sterile as far as war coverage goes.....I thought this was iteresting. Ive never seen video like this before, with audio of pilots talking.

video

hope the link works


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

Replies to this topic
Subject Author Message Date ID
RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 14th 2003
1
RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 14th 2003
3
      RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 14th 2003
5
RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 14th 2003
2
RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 14th 2003
4
RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 14th 2003
6
      RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
7
           RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
8
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
9
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
11
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
18
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
10
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
12
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
24
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
34
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
46
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
71
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
97
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
83
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
96
                               RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
98
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
100
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
101
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
102
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
114
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
43
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
45
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
16
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
25
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
37
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
39
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
40
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
41
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
47
                               RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
61
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
72
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
99
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
26
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
27
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
82
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
109
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
110
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
120
                               RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
130
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
131
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
136
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
137
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
139
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
141
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
140
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
142
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
144
                                                        RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
145
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
123
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
115
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
116
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
117
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
119
                               RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
126
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
134
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
121
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
135
                               RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
138
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
28
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
30
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
32
                               RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
33
                               RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
35
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
42
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
44
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
49
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
50
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
54
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
57
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
59
                                                        RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
62
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
63
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
65
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
68
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
69
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
70
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
73
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
75
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
77
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
80
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
81
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
90
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
87
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
86
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
85
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
52
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
84
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
118
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
122
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
48
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
51
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
53
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
56
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
58
                                                        RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
60
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
64
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
66
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
67
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
92
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
91
                               RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
74
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
76
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
78
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
79
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
94
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
104
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
105
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
107
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
108
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
124
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
106
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
112
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
146
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
149
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
154
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
127
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
128
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
129
                                                        RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
132
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
133
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
143
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
93
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
36
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
95
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
167
                RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
13
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
14
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
17
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
19
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
29
                               Grenada: how amazing
Jan 15th 2003
38
                                    RE: Grenada: how amazing
Jan 15th 2003
88
                     RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
15
                          RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
20
                               RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
21
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
22
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
23
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
31
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
55
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
May 22nd 2003
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 15th 2003
89
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
103
                                    RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
111
                                         RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 16th 2003
113
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 17th 2003
125
                                              RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
147
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
148
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
150
                                                        RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
151
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
152
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
153
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
155
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 18th 2003
156
                                                                       RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
159
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
May 22nd 2003
188
                                                                       RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
158
                                                                       RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
161
                                                   RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
157
                                                        RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
160
                                                        RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
162
                                                             RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
163
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
164
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
166
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
165
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
168
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
171
                                                                       RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
173
                                                                       RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
183
                                                                            RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
184
                                                                                 RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
185
                                                                  RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 19th 2003
170
                                                                       RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
172
                                                                            RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
174
                                                                            RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
175
                                                                                 RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
176
                                                                                      RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
177
                                                                            RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
178
                                                                                 RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
179
                                                                                      RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
180
                                                                                      RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
181
                                                                                      RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
182
                                                                                      RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
187
                                                                                      RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan
Jan 20th 2003
186
Is it a video or just Audio?
Jan 19th 2003
169

MykTue Jan-14-03 06:47 PM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#1. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 0)


  

          

Saw part of it on the TV news over the weekend. Looks like it's better to lay down and play dead than trying to run and ending up that way.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

    
PointmanTue Jan-14-03 07:14 PM
Charter member
1084 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#3. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Myk (Reply # 1)


          

Oh Myk, how could you suggest such a thing? You're not a member of the Possum Lodge that's featured on the Red Green TV show are ya?
For those who don't know. The motto of the mythical Possum Lodge is, "When all else fails, play dead."
Would I stoop to playing dead? Of course not! I'd try to surrender to a Predator drone - if I could find one.

Pointman

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

        
MykTue Jan-14-03 08:05 PM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#5. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Pointman (Reply # 3)


  

          

I'm a man,
I can change...
If I have to...
I guess.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

EdGreeneTue Jan-14-03 07:00 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#2. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 0)


          

Windows Media Player said it could not play this file, then suggested I 1) get connected to the Internet or 2) play it from a removeable disk!

Ed
I get it done with YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

hal9000Tue Jan-14-03 07:47 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#4. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 0)


          

I thought this was iteresting.

A rather clinical reaction wouldn't you say? 5 million Afghan civilians are homeless and displaced including women and children who aimlessly roam Afghanistan in search of food, work and shelter and Osama still remains at large.

"Interesting" is easy to say from that safe, sweet little star your on.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

    
robert70Tue Jan-14-03 08:43 PM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#6. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 4)


          

But think of all the Afghan's that are being liberated. (sarcasm)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

        
shadywillowWed Jan-15-03 12:59 AM
Member since Aug 19th 2002
74 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#7. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 6)


          

Okay maybe interesting was the wrong word. I didnt mean to sound insensitive. I can relate to the humanitarian side of war, but teaching kids to and kill Americans from the time they can walk and talk doesnt exactly make me feel all warm and fuzzy either. And yes, its too bad the one person we were after has never been found.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 01:06 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#8. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 7)


          

There is no humanitarian side to war. And if you're referring to teaching Afghanistan chidlren to kill Americans, I don't recall America ever being invaded by an Afghanistan Army.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                
shadywillowWed Jan-15-03 02:24 AM
Member since Aug 19th 2002
74 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#9. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 8)


          

<<There is no humanitarian side to war.>>
... I was under the impression, that was the reason for going to Afghanistan in the first place. To free the Afghanistani people from their own leaders because they lived in fear and poverty.



<<And if you're referring to teaching Afghanistan children to kill Americans, I don't recall America ever being invaded by an Afghanistan Army. >>

No, I was referring to their elders slipping over our borders and proceeding to blow up buildings and hijack planes.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                    
robert70Wed Jan-15-03 02:51 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#11. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 9)


          


>No, I was referring to their elders slipping over our
>borders and proceeding to blow up buildings and hijack
>planes.

If I am not mistaken 5 of the eleven hijackers are alive and living somewhere other than the states. Quite a feat I dare say.

In order for the elders to slip by - someone had to let them.
There were too many warnings in and from other countries to believe that no one could connect the dots as they say. The problem was in assembling all the dots on one page.

TTYL Bob

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                    
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 04:37 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#18. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 9)


          

Oh yeah, you mean the one's from Saudi Arabia? Where one fourth of the world's oil is located and where it also happens to be the religious center of all Muslims known as Mecca--the most holy city in Islam and where the US has a military presence and the Arab fundamentalist want the US out. Where our western influence of greed on the current Saudi regime has spawned all terrorism aimed at the US by Arab fundamentalist.

You mean that place? Or do you mean those Arabs under illegal occupation in Palestine?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                
baloWed Jan-15-03 02:37 AM
Charter member
2264 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#10. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 8)


          

>There is no humanitarian side to war. And if you're
>referring to teaching Afghanistan chidlren to kill
>Americans, I don't recall America ever being invaded by an
>Afghanistan Army.

That's odd. I don't recall America being invaded by the German Army or the Italian Army either. It would be interesting to gain some knowledge of Afghanistan and the life style there. Closer to Dodge City than civilization. Oh yes, before Hal reminds me we did make serious errors there by abandoning them in the past and leaving them to the Taliban. And yes, the "road to hell is paved with good intentions". But we do the best that we can, under the circumstances to help the most that we can. BTW, I'm not all that certain that that many people are "wandering around looking for . . ." But I am certain of the numbers hung and shot on soccer fields by the Taliban. I am also certain of the brutality to women and girls, the "honor" deaths, etc. Let's get real.

BTW, if running training camps that result in American deaths on the Cole, in Lebanon, at the WTC, don't count for invading Americans I am not sure what does.








http://www.bobbalogh.com/


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                    
robert70Wed Jan-15-03 03:05 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#12. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to balo (Reply # 10)


          

>>There is no humanitarian side to war. And if you're
>>referring to teaching Afghanistan chidlren to kill
>>Americans, I don't recall America ever being invaded by an
>>Afghanistan Army.
>
>That's odd. I don't recall America being invaded by the
>German Army or the Italian Army either. It would be
>interesting to gain some knowledge of Afghanistan and the
>life style there. Closer to Dodge City than civilization.
>Oh yes, before Hal reminds me we did make serious errors
>there by abandoning them in the past and leaving them to the
>Taliban. And yes, the "road to hell is paved with good
>intentions". But we do the best that we can, under the
>circumstances to help the most that we can. BTW, I'm not
>all that certain that that many people are "wandering around
>looking for . . ." But I am certain of the numbers hung and
>shot on soccer fields by the Taliban. I am also certain of
>the brutality to women and girls, the "honor" deaths, etc.
>Let's get real.

If I am not mistaken only the Capital City and a small area around it are actually "liberated" and the war lords control the rule the rest in what ever fashion they see fit, including the atrosities that you mention.

TTYL Bob

>

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                        
AlWed Jan-15-03 06:05 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#24. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 12)


  

          

Been there, Robert? Obviously not.

There is a place called Roberts Ridge in Afghanistan. Why don't you tell the widow of the man the ridge is named after how much of a waste its been?






  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
robert70Wed Jan-15-03 07:35 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#34. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 24)
Wed Jan-15-03 07:42 AM

          

>Been there, Robert? Obviously not.
>
>There is a place called Roberts Ridge in Afghanistan. Why
>don't you tell the widow of the man the ridge is named after
>how much of a waste its been?

NO, I can not say that I have, closed I have come is Pakistan and India and an escorted drive through part of the kypur pass.
But I am not quiet sure why you ask. Is it because I do not believe in the exaggeration that some how the war in afghanistan has liberated the county and it's people? Or is it because I have told you that there is proof that the war has not liberated the people.

I have never once spoken with any disrespect in regards to the devotion or valor of any fighting troops. I have all the respect in the world, for those who fought in Viet nam, but that will also not prevent me from realizing or saying that war was a waste of time and lives? You will have to convince me of the accomplishments of that war in regards to the number of good people who gave up their lives for those accomplishment.

Almost Forgot; Have you been there?
TTYL Bob

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 08:25 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#46. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 34)


          

I have never once spoken with any disrespect in regards to the devotion or valor of any fighting troops. I have all the respect in the world, for those who fought in Viet nam, but that will also not prevent me from realizing or saying that war was a waste of time and lives? You will have to convince me of the accomplishments of that war in regards to the number of good people who gave up their lives for those accomplishment.

Good for you! Since Al is so short on reason and reliable facts, he uses guilt every chance he gets to entice people to back down to his meaningless and unsubstantiated claims.


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
EdGreeneWed Jan-15-03 11:42 AM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#71. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 34)


          

Once and for all: the politicians lost Vietnam, not we grunts. We kicked Charlie's a$$ from one corner to the other. Even Tet 68 was a butt-stomping for Charlie.
Vietnam was not "lost", it was traded away and yes, it was a great waste of good men and women.

Ed-gunner, 106mm reckless rifles, 1st of the 05th (Airborne).
I get it done with YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
robert70Thu Jan-16-03 05:02 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#97. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 71)


          

>Once and for all: the politicians lost Vietnam, not we
>grunts. We kicked Charlie's a$$ from one corner to the
>other. Even Tet 68 was a butt-stomping for Charlie.
>Vietnam was not "lost", it was traded away and yes, it was a
>great waste of good men and women.
>
>Ed-gunner, 106mm reckless rifles, 1st of the 05th
>(Airborne).
>I get it done with YAHOO-DSL!

ed: if you re-read message 34, you will see I make no mention of who won or lost the war. Your comment that the politicians "traded it away" is exactly the point I have been trying to make. Politicians can put the military in harms way (at a great cost of life),and then change their minds and decide to walk away. Who are the real losers - I would say it was those who died for no just cause.
There is an appropriate time for war and an in-appropriate time for war.
Blind patriotism is worse then challenging the "war cry" of the politicians, who stand to loose nothing while all around them is death and destruction. As I have said after these countries are bombed back into the stone age will the States be any safer? Not from the war it will not.
What a shame people believe the politicians are out for your best welfare.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
AlWed Jan-15-03 08:23 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#83. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 34)


  

          

Yes, I have been there. Seen women going to school, and people dancing. And not just in the capital.




  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
robert70Thu Jan-16-03 04:39 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#96. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 83)
Thu Jan-16-03 05:12 AM

          

>Yes, I have been there. Seen women going to school, and
>people dancing. And not just in the capital.
>
>

Al :If the truth be known you would have to say that you saw a few women going to school,and a few people dancing. As I have stated earlier the remainder are under the rule of War Lords who rule as they see fit. The idea that the people have been liberated is very limited when compaired to the total population, and with little chance of expanding.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
AlThu Jan-16-03 06:05 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#98. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 96)


  

          

Three weddings...over 200 people dancing. Women in schools? 5 here, 10 there, 6 another place, etc... it is significantly different than when the Taliban ruled, no matter how you try to twist it. Go see for yourself.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
robert70Thu Jan-16-03 08:00 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#100. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 98)


          

>Three weddings...over 200 people dancing. Women in schools?
>5 here, 10 there, 6 another place, etc... it is
>significantly different than when the Taliban ruled, no
>matter how you try to twist it. Go see for yourself.

See: now you have gone from liberating the people to liberating a few.
The liberation that you speak about is only a consulation prize to the fact that in the haste to start bombing, escape routes were left open. If liberation was a real reason there are many other countries that practice the strictest of muslim religons, but the U.S. have ignored them.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
hal9000Thu Jan-16-03 08:09 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#101. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 100)


          

If liberation was a real reason there are many other countries that practice the strictest of muslim religons, but the U.S. have ignored them.

Exactly, like Saudi Arabia. When Britain withdrew its forces from "East of Suez" in 1971, the United States assumed a more direct role, deploying military advisers in the kingdom and providing Saudi Arabia with a vast arsenal of US weapons. The Defense Department also played a central role in organizing, equipping, training and managing the Saudi Arabian National Guard.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
AlThu Jan-16-03 09:25 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#102. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 101)


  

          

Not all Muslim countries practice the brand that the Taliban practiced.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
robert70Fri Jan-17-03 04:49 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#114. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 102)
Fri Jan-17-03 06:37 AM

          

>Not all Muslim countries practice the brand that the Taliban
>practiced.

I can not remember off the top of my head the proper name for the type of muslim religion I am talking about but I recall a women being sentenced to death by stoning because she produced a child out of wedlock. And if I recall correctly the father of the child recieved little or no punishment. Where people are publicly handed or flogged, hands are amputated, eyes are removed. I think I have made my point that the Taliband were not the only abusive rulers, although I agree that they were.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 08:19 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#43. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 24)


          

Robert, you'll learn that unless you've actually been to the geographical location that happens to be the subject matter of discussion, Al feels you aren't qualified to post. Al of course, has seen everything and been everywhere, so actually he's the only one qualified to respond to his own posts. It's a perfect set up--it's called a soliloquy.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 08:24 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#45. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 43)


  

          

Hal, that is complete and utter nonsense. I can say with some authority that Al has never, ever been inside my bathroom. So there! Wait.. whats the sound.. Al, goddamit, get outta my bathroom!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                    
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 04:04 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#16. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to balo (Reply # 10)
Wed Jan-15-03 04:06 AM

          

First of all, your analogy is absurd; an Afghanistan army never invaded Europe or any American Ally. The motivation guiding US involvement in Afghanistan evolved from the Cold War and the fear of an expanding Soviet influence to corporate oil and gas interests. In 1978, Afghan Communists came to power and the following year the Soviets invaded Afghanistan and established a puppet regime.

In 1980, Carter authorized the CIA to funnel money to the Afghan rebels through Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence. In 1981, Congress approved $1.6 million in assistance to Pakistan that got funneled through Pakistan Intelligence to aid the Afghan rebels. In 1986, Congress approved a deal to send 300 anti-aircraft missiles to the Afghan rebels and provide combat training. The CIA instructed Pakistan Intelligence to recruit Muslims to fight as rebels. Bin Laden, financed by the his father and the CIA, built a training center in Afghan and in 1989, the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan and Bin Laden set up the Al-Qaeda Network.

In 1995, the State Department NSA and the CIA formed a group to study U.S. oil and gas interests in Caspian region and Turkmenistan officials met with U.S. based Unocal Oil in Texas to discuss construction of gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to Pakistan thru Afghan. A deal was signed for an Afghan pipeline agreement with Unocal and the Saudi Arabian Delta Oil Company. The Taleban got greedy and the pipeline deal fell through. The US decided to invade Afghanistan to overthrow the Taleban before 911.

As is most always the case, the US has used its Armed Forces to protect Corporate interests around the world. Since you constantly question my sources, do your own research to verify the information in my post. It's all true. Here's a link to the BBC to get you started http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1550366.stm

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                        
Ed W.Wed Jan-15-03 06:06 AM
Charter member
2754 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#25. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 16)


          

>Since you constantly question my sources, do your own research to verify the information in my post. It's all true. Here's a link to the BBC to get you started http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1550366.stm<;


*IT'S ALL TRUE*

As usual...all verified by Hal himself.....

LOL

Ed W.

Ed W.

"IN GOD WE still TRUST - ALL OTHERS, WE used to MONITOR"

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
robert70Wed Jan-15-03 07:52 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#37. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Ed W. (Reply # 25)


          

>>Since you constantly question my sources, do your own research to verify the information in my post. It's all true. Here's a link to the BBC to get you started http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1550366.stm<;
>
>
>*IT'S ALL TRUE*
>
>As usual...all verified by Hal himself.....
>
>LOL
>
>Ed W.

Your link is Dead,my freind.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 08:02 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#39. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 37)


  

          

He put the > and < to indicate a quote, the actual link is the one that appeared in the post above by Hal. Here it is again.

BTW, they speld Taliban rong.. talk abowt por grammur.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 08:12 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#40. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 37)
Wed Jan-15-03 08:12 AM

          

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1550366.stm

Here it is. Ed altered the link. He's like one of those creepy little arsonists that likes to stand by and watch things burn up in flames. He probably got a hard on from seeing that you were unable to access the link he altered.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 08:15 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#41. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 40)


  

          

Damn, I need to get Ed to teach me that trick, Hal.. I would just stay at home the rest of my life!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 08:28 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#47. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 41)


          

LOL

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
Ed W.Wed Jan-15-03 10:01 AM
Charter member
2754 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#61. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 47)


          

Sorry you can't understand anything Hal. DM explained it rather well. I guess you will have to go back to spouting your usual BS, it's still the same after a year.

Wake up and smell the roses, they smell much better.

Ed W.

Ed W.

"IN GOD WE still TRUST - ALL OTHERS, WE used to MONITOR"

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
EdGreeneWed Jan-15-03 11:48 AM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#72. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Ed W. (Reply # 25)


          

>>Since you constantly question my sources, do your own research to verify the information in my post. It's all true. Here's a link to the BBC to get you started http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1550366.stm<;
>
>
>*IT'S ALL TRUE*
>
>As usual...all verified by Hal himself.....
>
>LOL
>
>Ed W.

But Ed W., did you actually search the suggested URL to verify the information Hal used? Or are you so shortsighted that you've made up your mind and you've decided that no facts, regardless of their own truth, will get in the way?

Ed G.
I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
robert70Thu Jan-16-03 07:52 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#99. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 72)


          

>>>Since you constantly question my sources, do your own research to verify the information in my post. It's all true. Here's a link to the BBC to get you started http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/1550366.stm<;
>>
>>
>>*IT'S ALL TRUE*
>>
>>As usual...all verified by Hal himself.....
>>
>>LOL
>>
>>Ed W.
>
>But Ed W., did you actually search the suggested URL to
>verify the information Hal used? Or are you so shortsighted
>that you've made up your mind and you've decided that no
>facts, regardless of their own truth, will get in the way?
>
>Ed G.
>I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!
>
Why should we let the facts get in the way of our decisions?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                        
AlWed Jan-15-03 06:08 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#26. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 16)


  

          

How is it that you always concern yourself with the conspiracy theory sites and not the whole of the actual congressional testimony? It's available you know. You won't get anything out of it, because you want to see what you see, but others might not see things as you do.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 06:19 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#27. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 26)


          

Most of the congress is composed of spineless and obsequious ass kissers. Every president from Gerald Ford through the first Bush has taken the position that War Powers Resolution Act was unconstitutional and acted as if it didn't exist.

When Clinton launched his raids on the aspirin factory in the Sudan and an empty terrorist camp in Afghanistan and waged his bogus war to save Kosovo from the Serbs, he wantonly ignored the War Powers Resolution. Virtually no one in government protested that he had exceeded his authority.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
MykWed Jan-15-03 04:42 PM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#82. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 27)


  

          

Good going, blame the US wholely for UN actions.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
EdGreeneThu Jan-16-03 09:08 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#109. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Myk (Reply # 82)


          

>Good going, blame the US wholely for UN actions.

Until just recently, the UN was the tail of the US dog, and we should not forget that. Only in the past 10 or so years has the UN successfully resisted the US and its goals. Been that way since day one.

Remember, Bush don't need no stinkin' UN to kick Saddam's butt so invoking the UN and its by now dubious influence over world affairs does no good, not in the face of what we (the US) and maybe Britain intend to do. What's that you say?

Kick the peanuts out of Saddam's M&Ms.

Ed
I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
hal9000Thu Jan-16-03 09:20 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#110. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 109)


          

And even now the US ignors the "no fly" zone rule imposed by the UN. According to the UN, the US has no authority in that air space over Iraq.

The only thing holding off the invasion thus far is that Germany and France have oil intersts previously appoved by Iraq. It's all about dividing up the spoils before the invasion.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
AlFri Jan-17-03 07:31 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#120. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 110)


  

          

Mind providing a source, HAL? Seems to me you just flat out lied.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
hal9000Fri Jan-17-03 08:15 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#130. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 120)


          

Look it up yourself, I'm tired of doing your grunt work and it's no lie. Before calling someone a liar you should investigate the facts. I thought you were suppose to be a man of honor.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
AlFri Jan-17-03 08:33 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#131. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 130)
Fri Jan-17-03 08:33 PM

  

          

Problem is, HAL, for the UN to pass any such resolution, the US would have to not veto it, which of course means no such resolution exists. So, yes, you just lied to us.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
hal9000Fri Jan-17-03 09:56 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#136. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 131)
Fri Jan-17-03 09:57 PM

          

>Problem is, HAL, for the UN to pass any such resolution, the
>US would have to not veto it, which of course means no such
>resolution exists. So, yes, you just lied to us.

The "no-fly" zone was never mandated by the UN Security Council!!

"UN Secretary General Kofi Annan has made clear that the international body does not view "no-fly" zone confrontations as a violation of the resolution. "Let me say that I don't think the Council will say that this is in contravention of the resolution that was recently passed..."

"The problem is, the flyers aren't enforcing a Council resolution. The U.S., Britain and France began in 1991 denying Iraq the right to fly in parts of its own airspace as a way of implementing UN resolutions urging protection for the Kurds in northern Iraq and the Shiites in the south from the wrath of Saddam. But the "no-fly" zone was never specifically mandated by the UN Security Council, and was rejected from the outset by Iraq as a violation of its sovereignty. Iraq's objections were backed by Russia and China, and in 1996 France withdrew its participation...."

http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,391985,00.html

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
AlSat Jan-18-03 06:40 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#137. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 136)


  

          

No, the "No-Fly" zone is part of the cease-fire agreement signed by the combatants. The UN didn't wage the Gulf war. You also claimed "The UN", not one man. The UNITED NATIONS is a collection of nations whose decisions are reflected in resolutions. There is no resolution, so it isn't "The UN" that says any such thing. As your comment here reflects. So, not only did you lie, you didn't even bother to think about your lie. Continuing to spew nonsense.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
MykSat Jan-18-03 07:02 AM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#139. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 137)


  

          

I thought the Gulf War was the UN. I believe you, but the UN did have some say in it, they said stop and we did.

Since it wasn't a UN thing I have to question "why not?". I thought the UN was supposed to be against invasions like that.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
AlSat Jan-18-03 07:30 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#141. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Myk (Reply # 139)


  

          

No, the UN didn't say stop.

The coalition was made up of the United States, France, UK, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Syria, Egypt, and a number of other nations. It was not a UN operation.

The Cease-Fire was signed at Safwan, Iraq on 3 March, 1991. Representing Iraq were LTG Salah Abdoul Mahmoud and LTG Sultan Hashim Ahmad. Might also note that it was a cease-fire, not a peace treaty. A peace agreement has never been signed related to the Gulf War.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
hal9000Sat Jan-18-03 07:20 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#140. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 137)


          

The "no-fly" zone was never mandated by the UN Security Council. That means there is no, "no fly zone?" The US is violating Iraq's air space.


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
AlSat Jan-18-03 07:32 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#142. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 140)
Sat Jan-18-03 07:33 AM

  

          

Don't get it, do you?

It doesn't matter what the UN said. The Cease-Fire mandated it. The UN doesn't have to say anything, as IRAQ agreed to those terms on 3 March 1991. And began violating them a few days later.

Iraq could have just continued to wage war against the coalition if they were so upset by the terms...



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
hal9000Sat Jan-18-03 08:40 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#144. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 137)


          

"The U.S., Britain and France began in 1991 denying Iraq the right to fly in parts of its own airspace as a way of implementing UN resolutions urging protection for the Kurds in northern Iraq and the Shiites in the south from the wrath of Saddam. But the "no-fly" zone was never specifically mandated by the UN Security Council, and was rejected from the outset by Iraq as a violation of its sovereignty. Iraq's objections were backed by Russia and China, and in 1996 France withdrew its participation...."

I've not read anything about the signing of any cease-fire agreement. Provide a link.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
AlSat Jan-18-03 09:09 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#145. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 144)


  

          

Read a book. Any competent history of the Gulf war.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
robert70Fri Jan-17-03 07:36 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#123. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 109)


          

>
>Remember, Bush don't need no stinkin' UN to kick Saddam's
>butt so invoking the UN and its by now dubious influence
>over world affairs does no good, not in the face of what we
>(the US) and maybe Britain intend to do. What's that you
>say?

You are only about ten years too late for me to put any faith in why you think your country must kill a bunch of innocent 3rd world people.
Where to hell do you think most of his weapons came from - the tooth fairy.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
robert70Fri Jan-17-03 05:15 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#115. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 26)
Fri Jan-17-03 06:35 AM

          

>How is it that you always concern yourself with the
>conspiracy theory sites and not the whole of the actual
>congressional testimony? It's available you know. You won't
>get anything out of it, because you want to see what you
>see, but others might not see things as you do.

Al: You are aware that the U.S. Britain and other countries sold munitions, mustard gas and biological agents as well as nuclear parts and equipment to Iraq right up to 1 week before Iraq invaded Kuwait.

You also speak of alliances and coalitions but I am sure you forgot to mention that many of the alliances that the US has made in the Middle East,and Afghanistan,and Pakistan were bought alliances.In order to bring these people on side the US had to buy them with promises of Aid,and loans to buy more American made weapons. If and when these coalitions falls apart the cost of restoring peace or stability is very large. The biggest enemy of your country was armed by your country. This is not the first alliance that has fallen apart and your own weapons were turned on you. Can you list a couple more examples of this? Who profits from weapon sales? Who pay's the price?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
MykFri Jan-17-03 05:47 AM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#116. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 115)


  

          

"promises of Aid"

The ol' damned if we do and damned if we don't argument. One day I hope the US govt wakes up to this and decides to "don't".
No more military aid, no more social aid, no more "free trade" aid.
Why not? When you're damned if you do and damned if you don't you may as well keep all the cookies for yourself.

But I have a political agenda saying that. I'm a Libertarian. If you want something from me you'd better be willing and able to wave a paycheck.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
robert70Fri Jan-17-03 07:02 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#117. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Myk (Reply # 116)


          

>"promises of Aid"
>
>The ol' damned if we do and damned if we don't argument. One
>day I hope the US govt wakes up to this and decides to
>"don't".
>No more military aid, no more social aid, no more "free
>trade" aid.
>Why not? When you're damned if you do and damned if you
>don't you may as well keep all the cookies for yourself.
>
>But I have a political agenda saying that. I'm a
>Libertarian. If you want something from me you'd better be
>willing and able to wave a paycheck.

Stop ranting and think for a momment - would you agree that N. Korea has the right to sell weapons and technology to all those countries that oppose the U.S. And before you answer keep in mind your country has broken its own rules and sold weapons rebells in order to further its',or someones', own goals. What if N. korea does the same. Can you see where we are headed? One more thought here - Your Pres. has surrouded himself with the largest number of politically pardoned "Gangsters" in known history. They have all ready proven that they are willing to lie to congress and do what they damn well please to accomplish their goals.
I think you can understand my reluctance to take as gospel truth anything that comes from the mouths of these people. Of coarse you are allowed to blindly believe anything you want, but before an unknown amount of human lives are lost I would prefer to go a little slower.


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
MykFri Jan-17-03 07:25 AM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#119. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 117)


  

          

That had nothing to do with what I replied to. Who's ranting now?

We bought a country off with aid, therefore we are evil.
Oops, we didn't give another country aid, therefore we are evil.

I don't know how you run your life but when I'm damned if I do and damned if I don't I stop doing. If you ever need help don't come crawling to me, I wouldn't want to buy you off with any aid.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
robert70Fri Jan-17-03 07:45 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#126. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Myk (Reply # 119)
Fri Jan-17-03 07:46 AM

          

>That had nothing to do with what I replied to. Who's ranting
>now?
>
>We bought a country off with aid, therefore we are evil.
>Oops, we didn't give another country aid, therefore we are
>evil.
>
>I don't know how you run your life but when I'm damned if I
>do and damned if I don't I stop doing. If you ever need help
>don't come crawling to me, I wouldn't want to buy you off
>with any aid.

Sorry if I mis-understood your coments, In my opinion you would not be damned if you got out of the weaapons for money,and weapons for aid
business. Nothing wrong with aid.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
MykFri Jan-17-03 09:27 PM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#134. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 126)


  

          

LOL, of course there's nothing wrong with free money.
You need to realize that nothing comes for free.

I've even had French people damn us because of post WWII aid, because they say we did it to have influence over them. And then there was a chewing gum conspiracy theory.

We're damned if we do and damned if we don't because humans don't like to admit weakness. In an effort to hide that weakness they bite the hand that's feeding them.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
AlFri Jan-17-03 07:32 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#121. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 115)


  

          

From 1941 to 1945 we armed and equipped the USSR. You have a problem with that? Nobody has hindsight beforehand.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
robert70Fri Jan-17-03 09:50 PM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#135. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 121)
Fri Jan-17-03 10:01 PM

          

>From 1941 to 1945 we armed and equipped the USSR. You have a
>problem with that? Nobody has hindsight beforehand.

If a Nation shares basically the same values as you do chances are pretty slim that you will need foresight or hindsight. If you sell arms for profit you need both,and risk the chance that you may have to go dis-arm someone who threatens to use the weapons you sold against you, or against others.

Your justification for war is more concrete when vales such as human rights change.


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
AlSat Jan-18-03 06:48 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#138. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 135)


  

          

Have you visited many places in the world? Few countries actually share values with the United States. It's a matter of culture. So, should we not assist Thailand? They don't share American values. Should we not assist Germany? They don't share American values (although they are closer than Thailand). Should we not assist Japan? They don't share American values. The list can go on and on. You can either choose to do something, and live with the consequences or your actions, or you can choose to do nothing and live with the consequences of your inaction. Hitler, Tojo, Stalin, Mao would have been happy with our inaction.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                        
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 06:31 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#28. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 16)


  

          

Absurd? Lets look at this one Hal..

"Where our western influence of greed on the current Saudi regime has spawned all terrorism aimed at the US by Arab fundamentalist."

Now there's proof that you are not only misguided, but shows that you find no ethical problem with making blanket statements that can't be proved or disproved. I'm no big supporter of the "super corporations", but attempting to lay the blame on them is pretty dumb. Anybody that gets on a plane and decides to hijack it might be making a political statement, but in the end it is THERE choice, they aren't being forced to do it.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 06:45 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#30. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 28)


          

Are you suggesting our western influence of greed on the current Saudi regime has not spawned terrorism aimed at the US by Arab fundamentalist? What blanket statement are you referring to?

The Saudi residents who were Arab fundamentalists and choose to participate in a revolutionary act against the US, most likely did so because of US corporate greed for control of Saudi oil.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 06:51 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#32. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 30)
Wed Jan-15-03 06:52 AM

  

          

aimed at the US by Arab fundamentalist.".. thats a blanket statement, with no proof or reason behind it. I might agree with that statement if you said "some" or even "quite a bit".

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 07:05 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#33. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 32)
Wed Jan-15-03 07:16 AM

          

Gimme a fu%$n break! Ok Doc, the major thrust of it. There may be splinter groups with any number of varying agendas, but for the most part the conflict this all boils down to is the control of oil and oil transportation routes by the wealthy corporate elite over the indigenous peoples in Iraq, and the whole Persian Gulf Region.

Your getting petty now and losing sight of the big picture.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 07:38 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#35. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 33)


  

          

The "indigenous people" in Iraq, whats left of them, now live in fear of Saddam Hussein in a small section of land in the northermost tip of the country, protected only by the No-Fly zones.

If you think its petty to question statements you make that are completely B.S. (and your statement was), then you better put on your flak jacket. I still haven't seen you give any legitimate reason for supposing that "the conflict this all boils down to is the control of oil and oil transportation routes by the wealthy corporate elite". I do see a lot of mindless, recycled rhetoric being portrayed as "fact".

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
robert70Wed Jan-15-03 08:16 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#42. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 35)
Wed Jan-15-03 08:19 AM

          

dm:
It will take me a little time but I'll find you links that state that during and after the Iran /Iraq war,as well as after that war that both the U. of S and the Brits were involved with selling arms to Iraq. these arms included weapons, 'copters and mustard gas as well as other biological agents. Some of these accounts even mention that the 'copters used to gas the Kurds were American made.
That being said where were the "liberators" while all this was happening - and now it is one of the reasons that the U of S uses as justification to bomb Iraq back into the stone age. Something does not smell right. I'll get back to ya shortly.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 08:21 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#44. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 42)


  

          

I don't need you to provide me links stating the the US sold arms to the Iraqi's during the Iran/Iraq war, who used them, how they were used, or where they are now. I already know all about it, so don't waste your time at google. Besides, what does that have to do with Hal's statement?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
robert70Wed Jan-15-03 08:43 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#49. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 44)


          

>I don't need you to provide me links stating the the US sold
>arms to the Iraqi's during the Iran/Iraq war, who used them,
>how they were used, or where they are now. I already know
>all about it, so don't waste your time at google. Besides,
>what does that have to do with Hal's statement?

I also stated that arms were sold after the war.And these arms are partially responsable for the fear and the death of many Kurds in the no fly zone.(see your first paragraph of message33) It was not a big deal while it was happening and the elite were making monies from the sales, but now it is a reason to go to war and put honurable men in harms way?
I Think something smells here.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 08:50 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#50. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 49)


          

Yeah, instead of blabbing away about recycled rhetoric, why don't start doing a little reading from sources other corporate owned media with an obvious agenda to maintain, like NBC one of the largest defense contractors around. You're the one rambling recycled garbage Doc.

Start here: http://www.geocities.com/hal9000report/hal80.html

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 09:02 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#54. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 50)


  

          

I'll trust your site and the information on it when you start using some footnotes or other references. Just like Rush Limbaughs "The Way Things Ought To Be" and "See, I Told You So", there are "facts" on your page that are not substantiated. Take a look at both books.. no footnotes, no bibliography, hardly any complete quotes.. yet it was marketed as not an entertainment style of book, but as a political/societal/historical survey of what was the current political climate. If you are using sources, you need to quote them or at least give credit in a bibliography of some sort. Without references, its not even worth reading.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 09:11 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#57. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 54)


          

Too thin Doc, too thin. Have you even read any link I've posted on this thread alone? If so, you've provided no specifics as to your rebuttal. I've used references in this forum continuously now for a year. And many here (now including you) have made verbal challenges to them without so much as one sentence of factual basis to refute my references.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 09:42 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#59. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 57)


  

          

>Too thin Doc, too thin. Have you even read any link I've
>posted on this thread alone? If so, you've provided no
>specifics as to your rebuttal. I've used references in this
>forum continuously now for a year. And many here (now
>including you) have made verbal challenges to them without
>so much as one sentence of factual basis to refute my
>references.


I have, and most of them draw conclusions that have nothing to do with the argument in question. The thesis of one, for example, is "I will argue that the current US government focus on Afghanistan is part of the oil security consideration." BFD, the current US government focus on Afghanistan also has to do with the fact that Bin Laden is a dick, that doesn't mean its the ONLY reason.

Oh, and then there is this one "*EVERYONE WHO HAS OIL AND GAS INTERESTS IN CENTRAL ASIA NEEDS STABILITY IN AFGHANISTAN". That includes Afghanistan, whose soon-to-be freed civilian population will make up the bulk of the labor force if (and thats a big if) they decide to use the area as a highway for transporting oil. Damn that dastardly US for giving them jobs, for getting rid of religious psychotics, and providing for women that, until the evil US arrived, weren't even allowed to learn how to read.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                        
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 10:06 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#62. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 59)
Wed Jan-15-03 10:07 AM

          



That's bullshit and just proves that you've been successfully brainwashed into believing that the only villain is Bin Laden. It wouldn't even occur to you that if the US should react to terrorist acts by bombing Afghanistan why shouldn't a lot of other countries react to previous US Terrorists acts by bombing the US, especially since they've suffered much worse terrorism. Why the profound hypocrisy. Anyone who's even minimally sane would try to explain the attacks. Unless you want to intensify further attacks, you will try and find out what lies behind these.

Damn that dastardly US for giving them jobs, for getting rid of religious psychotics, and providing for women that, until the evil US arrived, weren't even allowed to learn how to read.

Lol!! Have you forgotten, it's not our country!! We've just decided to invade their country, kill thousands of innocent women and children and put millions of people in Afghanistan of the verge of starvation so we can can later use their slave labor to make rich corporations richer.

You can go crack open a Bud now and turn up your country music.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 10:20 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#63. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 62)


  

          

>the current US government focus on Afghanistan also has
>to do with the fact that Bin Laden is a dick, that doesn't
>mean its the ONLY reason.

>
>That's bullshit and just proves that you've been
>successfully brainwashed into believing that the only
>villain is Bin Laden.

I never said he was the ONLY bad guy, we've got a few on our side. In fact, that sentence right there implies that there are MORE factors involved than just one.. why is that so hard to understand?


It wouldn't even occur to you that if
>the US should react to terrorist acts by bombing Afghanistan
>why shouldn't a lot of other countries react to previous US
>Terrorists acts by bombing the US, especially since they've
>suffered much worse terrorism.

It wouldn't? Are you sure? Are you living in my brain right now?

Why the profound hypocrisy.

There is no hypocrisy.

>Anyone who's even minimally sane would try to explain the
>attacks. Unless you want to intensify further attacks, you
>will try and find out what lies behind these.

You rely on your "sources" for explanations, I'll rely on mine.


>Lol!! Have you forgotten, it's not our country!! We've just
>decided to invade their country, kill thousands of innocent
>women and children and put millions of people in Afghanistan
>of the verge of starvation so we can can later use their
>slave labor to make rich corporations richer.

Nobody said it was our country, and it sure as hell doesn't belong to the Taliban. And the ground forces in Afghanistan don't really constitute an "invasion". Normandy, Omaha Beach.. now thats an invasion. And compare how many people were killed by the Taliban ON PURPOSE to the number of civilian casualties suffered at the hands of the US military that were ACCIDENTAL and I bet you will find the Taliban is way ahead. Millions have been on the verge of starvation since the 1890's, Afghanistan isn't what you would call a "farming place" (unless its opium poppies). And slave labor isn't going to happen in Afghanistan, because there will be too many people poking around looking for an excuse to bad-mouth anything the US does in that area.


>You can go crack open a Bud now and turn up your country
>music.

You've crossed the line now, Hal. I hate beer and I absolutely DESPISE country music. I'll have a Pepsi Twist and listen to Pet Shop Boys, if its all the same.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 10:56 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#65. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 63)
Wed Jan-15-03 10:57 AM

          



I don't suppose it could be like a democracy and belong to the people that live there. What a concept LOL!

And the ground forces in Afghanistan don't really constitute an "invasion".

I guess you forgot about the air campaign.

And compare how many people were killed by the Taliban ON PURPOSE to the number of civilian casualties suffered at the hands of the US military that were ACCIDENTAL and I bet you will find the Taliban is way ahead.

How would know, none of the three major networks’ nightly newscasts are offering even rough tallies of the mounting civilian casualties in Afghanistan. Like there's any sense to that equation anyway.

And slave labor isn't going to happen in Afghanistan, because there will be too many people poking around looking for an excuse to bad-mouth anything the US does in that area.

Like invade the country? LOL!

Now I know who I'm dealing with.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 11:05 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#68. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 65)


  

          


>I don't suppose it could be like a democracy and belong to
>the people that live there. What a concept LOL!

Occupation of territory isn't the only qualifying factor to legitimate claims of govermental control. If that were the case, we would all be singing "God save the king". Ever seen a schoolyard bully beating up a little kid? How many people step in and say "hey, knock it off". The Taliban is just that, an opportunistic schoolyard bully that stepped in and decided that things were going to be run "their way" (reminder: thats the way of publicly executing women that are raped).

>
>And the ground forces in Afghanistan don't really
>constitute an "invasion".

>
>I guess you forgot about the air campaign.

The air campaign doesn't constitute an invasion either, because it is focused on a few particular areas. You want an air invasion, think WWII and the Luftwaffe.


>
>How would know, none of the three major networks’ nightly
>newscasts are offering even rough tallies of the mounting
>civilian casualties in Afghanistan. Like there's any sense
>to that equation anyway.

If you bothered to look at the big picture, you would see that the equation makes perfect sense.


>Now I know who I'm dealing with.

No, you don't. Your still confused.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 11:16 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#69. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 68)
Wed Jan-15-03 11:19 AM

          



Lol!! Ok, so the house or apartment you occupy is actually not a legitimate claim of occupation so I can call your neighbor or the police and ask them to throw you out. And If I see you pushing around someone in your house I can trespass, move in, park my car in your spot and start slapping you around.

Who's confused? LOL!!


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 11:41 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#70. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 69)


  

          


>Lol!! Ok, so the house or apartment you occupy is actually
>not a legitimate claim of occupation so I can call your
>neighbor or the police and ask them to throw you out.

You could, if I was abusing my wife, my child, or anyone else. Occupation doesn't mean freedom to act like an asshole.

And If
>I see you pushing around someone in your house I can
>trespass, move in, park my car in your spot and start
>slapping you around.

Yes, you can! Furthermore, if you did not intervene when you you knew for a fact that I was abusing someone physically, you could be held liable by the court system. But the real question is would you? Are you content to be a passive, unacting observer, destined to hesitate at the moment of truth, or will you act?

>
>Who's confused? LOL!!

I'm completely lucid right now. That Pepsi Twist helped. Think I'll go support that gigantic corporation one more time, just to spite you


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 12:01 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#73. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 70)
Wed Jan-15-03 12:01 PM

          



What your saying is that I'd be justified in invading your home and using force against you if I happen to be walking down the street and saw you tackle a man in reaction to that man's initial punch thrown at you on your property that I did not see. What your suggesting is that there's no such thing as sovereignty. That any nation has carte blanche to invade any other nation at will because the invading nation has declared themselves in control regardless of the circumstances--exactly what the US is doing now and has done in the past.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 12:10 PM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#75. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 73)


  

          


>What your saying is that I'd be justified in invading your
>home and using force against you if I happen to be walking
>down the street and saw you tackle a man in reaction to that
>man's initial punch thrown at you on your property that I
>did not see. What your suggesting is that there's no such
>thing as sovereignty. That any nation has carte blanche to
>invade any other nation at will because the invading nation
>has declared themselves in control regardless of the
>circumstances--exactly what the US is doing now and has done
>in the past.


Once again, your not reading what I'm typing here. I said that you would be ethically (and probably legally) bound to intervene if you saw me abusing my wife, child, or anyone else. Abuse meaning me physically hitting or assaulting them without warrant (and even in some cases, having a good reason to hit your wife still isn't "good enough").

Whats happening and what has happened in Afghanistan is exactly that, people being abused by the Taliban without justification.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 12:16 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#77. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 75)


          

Uh-huh, so then I'd be legally within my rights to spray your house with bullets and kill everyone inside because you we're abusing your wife or child. And whoever I didn't kill with gunfire, I'd let roam around the backyard hungry, and lock them out of the house.


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 12:24 PM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#80. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 77)


  

          

I'm done with you Hal, because once again your not applying any common sense to this issue. If all your going to do is attempt to take a concept and remove it from its context and call that an argument, have fun, because you have obviously moved on and have made it clear that you no longer desire to have any kind of meaningful dialogue.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 12:32 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#81. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 80)


          

Tootaloo...

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
AlWed Jan-15-03 08:56 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#90. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 77)
Wed Jan-15-03 09:16 PM

  

          

Once again, HAL, you demonstrate that you don't have a clue about what the military does. Maybe you should watch that video again and listen to the GROUND CONTROLLER who is identifying every person in the target area and if they are a hostile or not. Someone (who happens to wear the crest you see in my signature) put their life at risk to make sure the people getting killed were armed combatants, not civilians. A bit more than you have the guts to do, isn't it?

Oh, and ask one of the folks here with a bit of imagery experience what those secondary explosions indicate.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
AlWed Jan-15-03 08:47 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#87. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 73)


  

          

Yeah, horrid thing...invading Nazi Germany in 1945...



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
AlWed Jan-15-03 08:46 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#86. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 69)


  

          

Well, HAL. I guess you believe that the occupied territories are part of Israel, correct?



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
AlWed Jan-15-03 08:38 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#85. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 62)


  

          

>We've just
>decided to invade their country, kill thousands of innocent
>women and children and put millions of people in Afghanistan
>of the verge of starvation so we can can later use their
>slave labor to make rich corporations richer.

Guess you missed it. We didn't invade. We assisted Afghanis. And we've not put anyone on the edge of starvation (they were already there). What we have done is saved many from starvation.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 08:53 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#52. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 49)


  

          

>I also stated that arms were sold after the war.And these
>arms are partially responsable for the fear and the death of
>many Kurds in the no fly zone.(see your first paragraph of
>message33) It was not a big deal while it was happening
>and the elite were making monies from the sales, but now it
>is a reason to go to war and put honurable men in harms way?
>I Think something smells here.


Yep, knew that too, but glad you caught it. I don't see your logic regarding the statement about elite making money, and that being a reason to go to war, it just went right over my head.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
AlWed Jan-15-03 08:30 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#84. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 42)


  

          

The United States was involved in supplying arms, ammunition, food, and other means to wage war to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945. So, do you blame us for the Gulags?



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
robert70Fri Jan-17-03 07:22 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#118. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 84)
Fri Jan-17-03 07:49 AM

          

>The United States was involved in supplying arms,
>ammunition, food, and other means to wage war to the Soviet
>Union from 1941 to 1945. So, do you blame us for the Gulags?

Of coarse not; but if you bought yourself an alliance and then those guns where used against you- how many lives would have to be lost before the light would come on and you would realize that maybe trafficking in arms only benefits those who make the weapons.
As I said your govt is controlled by a bunch of politically pardoned gangsters who have shown they did not give a shit about anything but their own cause. You trust, I'll question and hope Innocent people do not die for wrong causes.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
AlFri Jan-17-03 07:34 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#122. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 118)


  

          

Tell that to the Dega.




  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 08:40 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#48. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 35)
Wed Jan-15-03 08:44 AM

          

>The "indigenous people" in Iraq, whats left of them, now
>live in fear of Saddam Hussein in a small section of land in
>the northermost tip of the country, protected only by the
>No-Fly zones.

What the hell has that got to do with a US Invasion of Iraq to control the oil? You're responding now like the rest of the knee-jerk reactionaries in this forum. What sources are you challenging? I have entire web site devoted to these issues. Or should I bring the entire site to you here? Have you been there? If so, list the recycled rhetoric being portrayed as fact. Anyone can say that about anything.


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 08:50 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#51. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 48)


  

          


>What the hell has that got to do with a US Invasion of Iraq
>to control the oil?

Hal, you brought up the issue of "indigenous" people, I just responded to it. You may have an entire website devoted to something, that doesn't mean all or any of your facts are true. I could put up a website with "proof" that I'm actually a 5'10" black woman with curves, an attitude, and a desire for a "nice man, military background, to teach me discipline in bed", but that wouldn't necessarily be true.. I'm 5'11".

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 08:57 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#53. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 51)


          

I'm sorry but losing credibility with me here. That analogy is infantile. You better make an attempt to be more specific if we're going to have an intelligent discussion here.

Yes I bought up indigenous people and the relationship to the control of their oil by elite corporations who use government military forces to maintain control. So what's your point? You don't believe that's happening?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 09:08 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#56. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 53)


  

          

OK, so here's the scenario according to you, at least the way I'm reading it.

Kurds being killed by Saddam, who is in control of oil, and wants to start selling it to the US, who wants to buy it. US says "fuck that, we'll kill Saddam, put the Kurds in power, then we'll just make them do what Exxon-Mobile says".

No, I don't believe that is what is happening, because I haven't seen any evidence that it is.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 09:19 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#58. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 56)
Wed Jan-15-03 09:19 AM

          

Ok Doc, I see I'm beating a dead horse. I implore you to read the link I'm proving here and explore my web site. Every article I didn't write (most of them) has a link to the source.

I always thought you had an open mind, I guess I was wrong.

http://www.geocities.com/hal9000report/hal80.html

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 09:49 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#60. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 58)


  

          

Don't confuse "open minded" with "gullible" or "person that thinks just like I do".

The US is by no means perfect, but its the best game in town, and its our job to make it a better place. I've done my small part, and I'll continue to do it as long as my tired body and heart allow me to. Ask yourself what you are doing to make the US and the world a better place. And yes, you can do both at once.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 10:28 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#64. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 60)


          

You're beginning to sound just like Al. The essence of a democracy is to think independently. There's a blanket of intimidation that's been thrown over people for speaking out by the media and politicians and so most people would rather defer to authority.

I'm not one of those people. When one is an independent thinker, freedom is strived for no matter where you are! And freedom is preserved by continually monitoring the government and exercising your right to free speech.

I've heard that empty argument echoed before about questioning what one has done to make the US and the world a better place the minute someone questions the government. It's a scoundrel's argument. And one that reflects a failure to grasp even the most fundamental meaning of what freedom really is.

Take a hike.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                        
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 10:57 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#66. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 64)


  

          

>You're beginning to sound just like Al.

Al has a much deeper voice than I do. Believe me, Al and I have had our disagreements, and we will have many more. Just because we might agree (and I haven't asked him, neither have you) on some particular points of this topic doesn't mean we are the same person, or hold the same beliefs. Al is an individual, with his own rational thoughts and beliefs that he has developed over the course of his life...just like me.

The essence of a
>democracy is to think independently. There's a blanket of
>intimidation that's been thrown over people for speaking out
>by the media and politicians and so most people would rather
>defer to authority.

Just because some of the views I hold happen to be those of certain politicians or groups doesn't mean I hold them all. The bible says "don't fuck your neighbors wife", and I agree with that, but that doesn't mean I agree with everything in the bible.


>
>I'm not one of those people. When one is an independent
>thinker, freedom is strived for no matter where you are! And
>freedom is preserved by continually monitoring the
>government and exercising your right to free speech.


So basically, your saying that if anyone agrees with anything the government says, they are anti-democracy and anti-freedom. "Independant Thinkers", as you call them, are just as dumb and unenlightened as someone who agrees with everything "The Man" says. They aren't really independant at all, they're just hell bent on disagreeing with everything that is considered "the norm".. thats not independant thinking, thats knee-jerk reactionism!



>I've heard that empty argument echoed before about
>questioning what one has done to make the US and the world a
>better place the minute someone questions the government.
>It's a scoundrel's argument. And one that reflects a failure
>to grasp even the most fundamental meaning of what freedom
>really is.
>

Why is it a scoundrels argument, Hal? You're resorting to name calling now, because all of a sudden I disagree with you on this one point. We both have the same goal, that is freedom for all and oppression for none (except religious zealots.. fuck em), we just see different ways of getting there.

I know what freedom is, Hal, and I certainly don't need you to explain it to me. But then again, I'm just some ignorant fool, so don't even bother trying.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 11:04 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#67. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 66)


          

Ask yourself what you are doing to make the US and the world a better place.

You know as well as I what's implied in this statement. Don't try and use reverse psychology on me. You're the one challenging me and my claims.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                        
AlWed Jan-15-03 09:03 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#92. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 64)


  

          

You're not an independent thinker, HAL. You're a paranoid nutcase who can't think through anything logically because you have no idea what it actually takes to do anything in the real world. You attribute acts and motivations that anyone with any real experience knows is hogwash because it is beyond the scope of what is realistically possible and doable.

I know you don't believe this, but the CIA and the oil companies are filled with thousands of people, huge numbers of which would have to be intimately familiar with the details of all these plots, and keep them a secret. Ever told five people to keep a secret? Try it. It isn't a secret anymore when more than one person knows it.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
AlWed Jan-15-03 08:58 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#91. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 48)


  

          

The United States controlled the oil fields of Iraq and Kuwait in 1991. We didn't have to leave. We did.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
EdGreeneWed Jan-15-03 12:02 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#74. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 32)


          

>YOU said "Where our western influence of greed on the
>current Saudi regime has spawned all terrorism
>aimed at the US by Arab fundamentalist.".. thats a blanket
>statement, with no proof or reason behind it. I might agree
>with that statement if you said "some" or even "quite a
>bit".

It is simpler than all the convoluted reasoning being used here: America is blamed for waging war against Muslims from the soil that holds the holiest places to all Muslims. That, and bare armed American women and liquor swilling soldiers is what ticked Bin Laden and most of the 9/11 terrorists off.
As long as F-15s and other American war machines are based in Saudi Arabia and America supports Israel over the Arabs/Muslims, the terrorists will continue to come at America...

Ed
I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 12:11 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#76. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 74)


          

That's right and that's why I've said that anyone who's even minimumly sane would try to explain the attacks. Unless you want to intensify further attacks, you will try and find out what lies behind these.

Based on that reasoning, it's not difficult to determine where the solution to terrorism against the US lies.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
doctormidnightWed Jan-15-03 12:19 PM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#78. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 74)


  

          


>It is simpler than all the convoluted reasoning being used
>here: America is blamed for waging war against Muslims from
>the soil that holds the holiest places to all Muslims. That,
>and bare armed American women and liquor swilling soldiers
>is what ticked Bin Laden and most of the 9/11 terrorists
>off.
>As long as F-15s and other American war machines are based
>in Saudi Arabia and America supports Israel over the
>Arabs/Muslims, the terrorists will continue to come at
>America...
>
>Ed
>I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!
>


So its simpler to lie? Because thats what Hal did when he said "our western influence of greed on the current Saudi regime has spawned all terrorism aimed at the US by Arab fundamentalist". Its just not true, terrorism directed at the US by Arab fundamentalists (and thats even a misnomer.. "Arab" denotes a geographical and cultural background, "Muslim" is entirely religious) cannot and will never be solely based on the greed of these corporations. I've already stated that Hal is correct on this point to a certain extent, but saying that ALL terrorism is based on it is just ridiculous.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 12:23 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#79. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 78)


          

You do a disservice to yourself by calling me a liar. I don't really think you mean that and we've already discussed the ramications of that post.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
AlWed Jan-15-03 09:07 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#94. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 79)


  

          

How many terrorists have you ever met, HAL? But you're an expert on their motivations and the solutions to their attacks?



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
EdGreeneThu Jan-16-03 02:20 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#104. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 78)


          

>
>So its simpler to lie? Because thats what Hal did when he
>said "our western influence of greed on the current Saudi
>regime has spawned all terrorism aimed at the US by Arab
>fundamentalist". Its just not true, terrorism directed at
>the US by Arab fundamentalists (and thats even a misnomer..
>"Arab" denotes a geographical and cultural background,
>"Muslim" is entirely religious) cannot and will never be
>solely based on the greed of these corporations. I've
>already stated that Hal is correct on this point to a
>certain extent, but saying that ALL terrorism is based on it
>is just ridiculous.

My post on this topic laid-out the real, not the philosophical or politically fabricated reason for 9/11.
Bin Laden, a Saudi, the ringleader of the terorism agains the United States, is and was, simply pissed about Americans and America being on the most sacred (To Muslims) soil of Islam.
Worse, Bin Laden also took personal umbrage at the US for allowing "infidel", near-naked women into Saudi Arabia. You recall his first attempt was the World Trade Center blast of 1993.

In some geo-political sense, oil may play a part in the terrorism, but the root and brach of the recent and ongoing terrorism against us is our outright occupation of land all Muslims consider sacred. Let America leave Saudi Arabia and the terrorism against America would subside to a low roar.
Then again, as long as we, America, continue to prop up Israel, who knows.. ?


I get it done with YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
hal9000Thu Jan-16-03 03:05 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#105. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 104)
Thu Jan-16-03 03:05 PM

          



And that occupation of land is over the control of oil. And BTW, complete military supremacy can only be achieved if you control the oil. Oil was an essential factor in WW2. Although the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended the war, it was oil that fueled the armies to defeat Germany and Japan. Additionally, oil represents immense profits for whoever controls it.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
AlThu Jan-16-03 07:06 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#107. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 105)


  

          

So that is why we left those oilfields after Desert Storm?



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
hal9000Thu Jan-16-03 07:44 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#108. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 107)


          

LOL!

I wondered about that myself until I realized that the US would use that as a reason to beef up and maintain a US presence in Saudi Arabia for control of the entire Persian Gulf. Look, this is like chess--once Iraq is invaded, think of the strategic points the US will have control over and then look at a map: Israel, Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Additionally, Israel can then begin maneuvering Palestinians further East into Jordan so that they'll finally be removed from Palestine altogether.

Syria is unstable, Turkey is becoming unstable and Egypt is bordered by Lybia. If you begin to think like Kissinger, you'll begin to understand. Look at the big picture.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
AlFri Jan-17-03 07:37 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#124. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 108)


  

          

Keep reaching, HAL....

Your theories are more convoluted than a Tom Clancy novel.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
AlThu Jan-16-03 07:05 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#106. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 104)


  

          

So, how does that explain the attack in Indonesia? The foiled events elsewhere? Including attempts against other Muslims, and against Buddhists?

Attempting to apply western thought processes to non-westerners, and attribute sane reasons for actions to those who have demonstrated their williness to use insane methods are sure ways to reach false conclusions.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
quintThu Jan-16-03 09:31 PM
Member since Sep 06th 2002
117 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#112. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 104)
Thu Jan-16-03 09:43 PM

  

          

<Let America leave Saudi Arabia and the terrorism against America <would subside to a low roar.
<Then again, as long as we, America, continue to prop up Israel, who <knows.. ?


So, you advocate appeasing our enemies, and turning our back on our friends?


quint

quint

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
EdGreeneSat Jan-18-03 12:33 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#146. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to quint (Reply # 112)


          

><Let America leave Saudi Arabia and the terrorism against
>America <would subside to a low roar.
><Then again, as long as we, America, continue to prop up
>Israel, who <knows.. ?
>
>
>So, you advocate appeasing our enemies, and turning our back
>on our friends?
>
>
>quint
____________________________________________________

You missed my entire point even as you quoted it:

1. "Let America leave Saudi Arabia..." meant if things went back to the way they were before the build up for GULF WAR l, that time when only F-15s parked in revetments were the only US presence there. Since the build up for GULF WAR l began, women (whom the Saudis severely control) and other infidels (Christians) took up what was supposed to be temporary residence in Saudi Arabia and
2. "... Then again, as long as we," meant some, and before GULF WAR l, of the resentment of America is directed toward we Americans because of our unflinching support of Israel.
Had you put the entire thought together, you should have taken those meanings as reasons for the intensifying terrorism we face. You chose instead to rephrase it into "turning our back on our friends" and "appeasing our enemies".

If we go back to before GULF WAR l, Saudi Arabia was well defended by 1. The near-by US presence and a few dozen brand new Saudi F-15s manned by Saudi pilots. Since 9/11, hatred of America and we Americans has intensified; their hatred for us fueled by... our unflinching support of Israel.

Thinking and talking geopolitically now, Israel is a millstone around out necks. Like Europe, Israel is able to defend itself, unless you personally are totally unaware of Israel's self-defense capabilities, underwritten in huge parts by their total dominance of the air space in a region extending 200 miles from Jerusalem. Israel owns the air.
Nearly EVERY worthwhile target in the so-called "Middle East" is already targeted by Israel. Armed with our freshly supplied cluster munitions, the Israeli Air Force could whip the five closest armies in a matter of days. Israel controls the land approaches to Israel and her total mastery of the skies makes Israel is not only formidable, but unbeatable. We can let Israel go it alone.
(If we go back to GULF WAR l, only US influence kept Israel in check, especially after the Scuds starting falling).

I thought anyone reading what you quoted from my post would know what my statement meant, because they would also be aware of what I just posted above. I see you did not understand the meaning because you did not have those facts readily at hand. Now you do.
(Political myopia about the "Middle East" got us where we are today).

Lastly, it does not matter who "controls" the land where the oil is. As has been noted, we simply picked up and moved out of Kuwait after the war but stupid us; we continued to build up in Saudi Arabia, a holy place to Muslims and the flashpoint for Bin Laden.


Ed
I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
AlSat Jan-18-03 04:24 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#149. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 146)


  

          

You are still assuming that terrorism is confined to the Middle East, which it is not.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
quintSat Jan-18-03 09:25 PM
Member since Sep 06th 2002
117 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#154. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 146)


  

          

Thanks for the clarification. As Jerry Garcia once sang:

"...got two good eyes, but still don't see..."


quint

quint

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
EdGreeneFri Jan-17-03 07:33 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#127. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 104)


          

>>
>>So its simpler to lie? Because thats what Hal did when he
>>said "our western influence of greed on the current Saudi
>>regime has spawned all terrorism aimed at the US by Arab
>>fundamentalist". Its just not true, terrorism directed at
>>the US by Arab fundamentalists (and thats even a misnomer..
>>"Arab" denotes a geographical and cultural background,
>>"Muslim" is entirely religious) cannot and will never be
>>solely based on the greed of these corporations. I've
>>already stated that Hal is correct on this point to a
>>certain extent, but saying that ALL terrorism is based on it
>>is just ridiculous.
>
_____________________________
1. In the matter of oil, Venezuela and Nigeria are more important to the US than Saudi Arabia.

2. Oil is universal.

3. Let them build pipelines in Tibet if they want. All we (The United States) want is to be able to buy cheap oil. Sure new pipelines would benefit the oil people but also, in the long run, the consumer.
FYI: it was electricity that made and makes America the world's 800 pound production Gorilla. When Roosevelt started the REC, America became the first country in the world to be wired from corner to corner. It was that hard wiring of America before the outbrak of war in 1939 which let us produce more than 100,000 combat and service aircraft, 160,000,000+ weapons, tens of thousands of tanks, billions of rounds of ammunition. Guess what? Back then, most of the country got its electricity from...coal.

4. "Occupying" Iraq just to control its rather puny oil reserves would be Forrest Gump stupid, even for Texas oilmen.

5. We don't drill for oil so much anymore here because it is cheaper to buy it.

6. The oil under the United States is part of our strategic war reserve anyway.

Want to stop the "terrorists" and terrorism?
Let's 1. Get out of Saudi Arabia

2. Stop underwriting Israel and

3. Stop choosing our friends and/or our enemies according to their politics (or religion).

Ed
I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
AlFri Jan-17-03 07:38 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#128. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 127)


  

          

>Want to stop the "terrorists" and terrorism?
>Let's 1. Get out of Saudi Arabia
>
>2. Stop underwriting Israel and
>
>3. Stop choosing our friends and/or our enemies according to
>their politics (or religion).
>
>Ed
>I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!

So, tell me how that stops the Irish Republican Army? Or how it would have stopped the Red Brigade? How about FARC?

Terrorists have always been with us, they always will be. To attribute understandable, sane motives to them is to lie to yourself.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
hal9000Fri Jan-17-03 08:07 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#129. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 128)
Fri Jan-17-03 08:09 PM

          

The English could have labeled the new American colonists as terrorists for resisting the British. Take the vilification of the Serbs, Yugoslavia was the one country in Eastern Europe that would not voluntarily shed what remained of its socialist system and install a free-market economic order. The U.S. goal has been to transform the Yugoslav nation into a Third World region. Take the Reagan war against Nicaragua, or the protracted war against the people of El Salvador. All these are attempts to oppress people by the US in the name of spreading democracy for the purpose of control and expansion of a capitalist system at the expense of the native people.

Terrorism is not a weapon of the weak but the powerful. It is held to be weak because the strong control the media and their terror doesn't count as terror. Nazi's weren't carrying out terror in occupied europe, they were protecting the population form the terrorism of the partisans. Nazi's were carrying out what they called counter terrorism. Terrorism is the weapon against whoever happens to resist America's attempts at imperial colonization.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
AlFri Jan-17-03 08:35 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#132. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 129)
Fri Jan-17-03 08:37 PM

  

          

Maybe you should do a little research on how terrorism is defined, HAL.

Mind pointing out what civilians were intentionally targeted in the American Revolution?

The bullshit about "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" is just trash spread by those unwilling or unable to actually wage war against a military.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
hal9000Fri Jan-17-03 09:15 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#133. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 132)


          

>The bullshit about "one man's terrorist is another man's
>freedom fighter" is just trash spread by those unwilling or
>unable to actually wage war against a military.

That's why the word terrorism is used. It's used to characterize those who resist a powerful military force. And the fact is, the US has used Counterinsurgency (Terrorism) against people fighting for social justice. As in Guatemala, El Salvador, Columbia, Cuba, Angola, Mozambique, Ehtiopia, Portugal, Nicaragua, Cambodia and East Timor.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
AlSat Jan-18-03 07:37 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#143. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 133)


  

          

LMAO

Seems you have your terms screwed up, HAL. Terrorists target civilian populations, not military. And Counterinsurgency is not terrorism. Your lack of knowledge of what really occurs in CI operations is hilarious. Stop reading fiction and go visit some of those countries.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
AlWed Jan-15-03 09:05 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#93. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 74)


  

          

Hmmm..that explains the bombing in Indonesia...



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                    
robert70Wed Jan-15-03 07:50 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#36. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to balo (Reply # 10)


          

>>There is no humanitarian side to war. And if you're
>>referring to teaching Afghanistan chidlren to kill
>>Americans, I don't recall America ever being invaded by an
>>Afghanistan Army.
>
>That's odd. I don't recall America being invaded by the
>German Army or the Italian Army either. It would be
>interesting to gain some knowledge of Afghanistan and the
>life style there. Closer to Dodge City than civilization.
>Oh yes, before Hal reminds me we did make serious errors
>there by abandoning them in the past and leaving them to the
>Taliban. And yes, the "road to hell is paved with good
>intentions". But we do the best that we can, under the
>circumstances to help the most that we can. BTW, I'm not
>all that certain that that many people are "wandering around
>looking for . . ." But I am certain of the numbers hung and
>shot on soccer fields by the Taliban. I am also certain of
>the brutality to women and girls, the "honor" deaths, etc.
>Let's get real.


If you believe that then tell me: where were you liberators before before the events of 9/11 or do you also believe all these atrocities started that day?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                        
AlWed Jan-15-03 09:14 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#95. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 36)


  

          

Can't be everywhere at once, you know. Some of those "liberators" were trying to deliver food in Somalia in 1993. Others were in Kosovo and Bosnia. Some were training Thai troops in Counter-terrorism. Others working in Rwanda, and a number of other places in Africa, most with little or no publicity. A pretty large number were in Kuwait and Iraq in 1991. Some were doing really simple things, like training people in the Sinai Desert, in Cambodia, in Laos how to safely disarm and handle mines. Others were working in building roads, digging wells, and building schools in a variety of countries in Latin America. Some were helping to try and stop the actions of criminals and terrorists in Central America.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
EdGreeneSun Jan-19-03 07:43 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#167. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 95)


          

>Can't be everywhere at once, you know. Some of those
>"liberators" were trying to deliver food in Somalia in 1993.
>Others were in Kosovo and Bosnia. Some were training Thai
>troops in Counter-terrorism. Others working in Rwanda, and a
>number of other places in Africa, most with little or no
>publicity. A pretty large number were in Kuwait and Iraq in
>1991. Some were doing really simple things, like training
>people in the Sinai Desert, in Cambodia, in Laos how to
>safely disarm and handle mines. Others were working in
>building roads, digging wells, and building schools in a
>variety of countries in Latin America. Some were helping to
>try and stop the actions of criminals and terrorists in
>Central America.

Ah-damn, a blatant Special Forces recruiting blurb!

Ed
I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                
HauxfanWed Jan-15-03 03:11 AM
Charter member
1072 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#13. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 8)


          

Hal's quote<I don't recall America ever being invaded by an Afghanistan Army.> '

I think we would like to keep it that way too!


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                    
baloWed Jan-15-03 03:21 AM
Charter member
2264 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#14. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Hauxfan (Reply # 13)


          

>Hal's quote<I don't recall America ever being invaded by an
>Afghanistan Army.> '
>
>I think we would like to keep it that way too!
>
>

Do the camps for training terrorists in Afghanistan not count toward "invading America" when the results are terrorists attacks from the USS Cole to the WTC?

Perhaps General Sherman put it best during the Civil War:

"You cannot qualify war in harsher terms than I will. War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; and those who brought war into our country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out. I know I had no hand in making this war, and I know I will make more sacrifices to-day than any of you to secure peace."









http://www.bobbalogh.com/


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                        
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 04:17 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#17. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to balo (Reply # 14)


          

LOL!!

Since World War II, US forces have directly invaded or launched aerial attacks against Vietnam, The Dominican Republic, North Korea, Laos, Cambodia, Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, Libya, Iraq and Somilia.

Before World War II, US military forces waged a war of conquest in the Philippines from 1899 to 1903. Along with 14 other capitalist nations, the US invaded and occupied parts of socialist Russia from 1918 to 1921. US expositionary forces fought in China along with other Western armies to suppress the Boxer Rebellion and keep the Chinese under the heel of European and North American colonizers.

US marines invaded and occupied Nacaragua in 1912 and again from 1926 to 1933; Haiti from 1915 to 1934; Cuba from 1898 to 1902; Mexico in 1914 and 1916. There were 6 invasions of Honduras between 1911 to 1925 and Panama was occupied between 1903 and 1914.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
MykWed Jan-15-03 04:51 AM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#19. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 17)


  

          

Why do you never mention Hawaii in your "America is only out for Corporate interests" rants?
It seems to me that that is the one that would back up your claims the most.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
AlWed Jan-15-03 06:36 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#29. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 17)
Wed Jan-15-03 06:38 AM

  

          

Yeah, Hal.

Let's take that invasion of Grenada in 1983. Maybe you need your memory refreshed...(are you old enough to remember it?).

In October, 1983, Deputy Prime Minister Coard heads a coup which arrests Prime Minister Bishop. This is followed by anti-Coard, pro-Bishop demonstrations. The crowds release Bishop. Coard's military supporters massacre over 100 Grenadians and execute Bishop, 4 of his Ministers and 3 prominent supporters.

On 19 October, 1983, General Austin seizes power (Coard having fled). On 21 October, 1983, the Organization of Caribbean States (Dominica, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, Montserrat, St Kitts-Nevis, Antigua) meet and vote to intervene militarily to restore order. They appeal to Jamaica, Barbados and the United States for assistance. (Formal plea presented under Article 8 of the OECS Charter on 23 October).

On 22 October, 1983, the CARICOM (Caribbean Community) meets and votes to support intervention.

There were roughly 1000 American citizens on Grenada at the time, most medical students at St George's University Medical School.

On 22 October, 1983, Castro gave permission for Cuban forces already on the island, as advisors and defenders of the airfield at Port Salines. Cuba and Castro had previously denounced the murder of Bishop.

Also on 22 October, 1983, a delegation visited Grenada to evaluate conditions and attempt to arrange a civilian evacuation. They were blocked from accomplishing anything by the RMC (Austin's Gov't).

With a letter from Governor-General Scoon requesting outside intervention, and shortwave transmissions from the medical school indicating the students were being held prisoner, as well as information on the holding of another US citizen at Richmond Hill Prison, on 25 October, 1983, the United States acted on the requests for assistance they had received and launched a military operation. 18 American servicemen lost their lives there. 116 were wounded. 25 Cubans died, and 59 were wounded. 45 PRA died and approximately 350 were wounded. All US combat forces withdrew by mid-December. Captured and destroyed weapons included 3 armored vehicles and huge amounts of AK47s, mortars, and RPG-7s. Troops from Jamaica and Barbados also took part in the mop-up operations.

The people of Grenada were happy to see Americans. The students at St. Georges were even happier. We were hailed as liberators. I know, I was there.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
RoperaWed Jan-15-03 07:59 AM
Charter member
5863 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#38. "Grenada: how amazing"
In response to Al (Reply # 29)


          

In Argentina the news were that a left-wing government was elected, U. S. didn't like it, so they invaded.


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
AlWed Jan-15-03 08:49 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#88. "RE: Grenada: how amazing"
In response to Ropera (Reply # 38)


  

          

HAL would use the version of the news from Argentina to support his bias.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                    
robert70Wed Jan-15-03 03:29 AM
Member since Sep 28th 2002
324 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#15. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Hauxfan (Reply # 13)
Wed Jan-15-03 03:29 AM

          

>Hal's quote<I don't recall America ever being invaded by an
>Afghanistan Army.> '
>
>I think we would like to keep it that way too!

I think there are other less expensive and more effective ways of securing your country than that of war. Remember we are talking lives here and once you finish with the bombing etc. are you any securer




  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                        
labyrinthWed Jan-15-03 04:53 AM
Member since Oct 13th 2002
1252 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#20. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to robert70 (Reply # 15)


          

One of the things that has always bothered me about war is the cost. Forget the lives and the destruction for the moment. I'm just talking about the cost to wage war. Give me the money the U.S. has spent waging war inside Afganistan, and I could have bought all the land within every major city in the entire country, and still have enough left over to employ the populace to rebuild the entire infrastructure. If that was done, then the people would go after anything or anybody who threatened their right to flushing toilets, and water coming out of their kitchen sink faucet. Let alone their right to shop in a market that could deliver little things like toilet paper, oranges, eggs, and videos. Why fight people who have nothing, and nothing to lose? Employ them. Then they get what they want and then they have something to lose. They really only want the ability to join the rest of the world. Is that really so hard to create? Sure, we can spend trillions so that we can target a flea on some guys butt, but we can't spend hundreds of millions so we don't have too?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 05:32 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#21. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to labyrinth (Reply # 20)


          

And who pays for war? You and me--the taxpayer pays for war and in the case of Afghanistan, it has to do with paving the way for a natural gas pipeline for corporate interests.

http://www.peacenowar.net/Nov%208%2001--Oil.htm

http://members.localnet.com/~jeflan/jfafghanpipe.htm

One could argue that it is the really the conservatives who lack patriotism when they denounce spending on human services, environmental protections and fair taxes.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
andrini2000Wed Jan-15-03 05:45 AM
Charter member
2001 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#22. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 21)


  

          

Thanks for sharing the link Shady!!
In war, accidents happen.
Innocents die. That's the way war works. Unfortunately.



Gravity....not just a good idea, it's the law!
My Magic

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 05:51 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#23. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to andrini2000 (Reply # 22)


          

Yeah, but what a relief: one sweet world around that star is spinning.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
labyrinthWed Jan-15-03 06:51 AM
Member since Oct 13th 2002
1252 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#31. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 23)


          

Hal, don't you remember the old adage: "What if they gave a war and nobody came." This can only happen one person at a time. Which Corps. give a damn about the oil, or who wants the war to get the oil wouldn't matter... If Nobody goes, there is no war. Simple as taking a dump, if all the plumbing is working properly..

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
hal9000Wed Jan-15-03 09:02 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#55. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to labyrinth (Reply # 31)


          

Your right! John Lilly who wrote Center of the Cyclone said the same thing, he called it creeping by contagion.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
andrini2000Thu May-22-03 01:52 AM
Charter member
2001 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"


  

          





Gravity....not just a good idea, it's the law!
My Magic

Attachment #1, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
AlWed Jan-15-03 08:51 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#89. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to labyrinth (Reply # 31)


  

          

It isn't very hard to point to people in history who've tried that approach. They are generally dead, and their people extinct.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
hal9000Thu Jan-16-03 01:21 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#103. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to labyrinth (Reply # 31)


          

I found the exact quote from John Lily:

"It is better not to try to devise groups, techniques, churches, places, or other forms of human organization to encourage, foster, or force upon others these states. If these states are going to do anything with humanity, they must "creep by contagion," as it were, from one individual to the next."

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                
EdGreeneThu Jan-16-03 09:29 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#111. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 21)


          

>And who pays for war? You and me--the taxpayer pays for war
>and in the case of Afghanistan, it has to do with paving the
>way for a natural gas pipeline for corporate interests.
>
>http://www.peacenowar.net/Nov%208%2001--Oil.htm
>
>http://members.localnet.com/~jeflan/jfafghanpipe.htm
>
>One could argue that it is the really the conservatives who
>lack patriotism when they denounce spending on human
>services, environmental protections and fair taxes.
_______________________________

Hal, is it possible you can somehow make your argument without invoking the spectre of an on-going conspiracy betweeen Congress, the US military and civilian oil Barons? Surely you know oil Barons buy oil at the cheapest price they can and from whomever and wherever they please? Any new pipeline, (wherever) it is built, simply becomes a conduit for the oil the Barons are going to buy anyway, come hell or high water. If the new pipeline makes oil cheaper, why the hell do we (you and me) care?

And what is so damn wrong with the US and its corporations wanting to secure our energy future by whatever legal means?
Is it because someone is going to make a lot of money? Who cares?

When making your arguments, try to leave out suggestions of ulterior motives or cast aspersions that impugn the intergrity and honor of the US military.

Ed
I get it done with YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                    
hal9000Thu Jan-16-03 10:12 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#113. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 111)
Thu Jan-16-03 10:15 PM

          

It's no conspiracy. Joint US and corporate oil interests dates back to just after WW2, when the State Department proposed the formation of a government-owned oil firm to acquire concessions in Saudi Arabia and extract the kingdom's reserves. This plan was considered too unstable and instead the US turned this task over to the Arabian American Oil Company (ARAMCO), an alliance of major US oil corporations.

What's wrong with oil corporations wanting to secure our energy from another country? Plenty. Its not legal and it's not their oil! And in the process, innocent civilians die! You're naive if you think the US military and powerful elite corporations don't work together hand in hand. And not just for control of oil but for cheap labor and natural resources. Three quarters of the natural resources on Africa, Asia, and Latin America are controlled by American and European corporations. What do you think the war in Yugoslavia and Chechnya is about. The United States has a standing army exceeded in size only by China's. You ought to ask yourself why American armed forces are stationed in more than 100 countries, even though we are not at war. This is the Roman Empire your in. The central imperative of capitalism is expansion. Investors don't invest money unless they extract more than they invest. Third world countries are underpaid for their exports and overcharged for the goods they buy like the brothers when they shop at 7/11. Carving up the world at the expense of its indigenous people is the reality of imperialist expansion.

Tell you what, give me your ass for eights weeks and I'll put your head in the right space so you can get your mind right on this...sir.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
AlFri Jan-17-03 07:42 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#125. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 113)


  

          

HAL,

You really need to actually draw up a plan for the things you claim. Include all the requirements for logistical and personnel support. Then figure out how to actually do it. Just one of the conspiracies that you claim would take more resources than could possibly be ever recovered as a result of the plan. Not to mention the number of people required and the need for security.

Get a grip. Your paranoia is boring.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                        
EdGreeneSat Jan-18-03 01:02 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#147. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 113)


          

Sorry Hal, but I want to comment on just this part of your statement:
>What's wrong with oil corporations wanting to secure our
>energy from another country? Plenty. >

Reality is I, (and a few million others), think like this: I don't shive a get who "controls" the oil in the ground as long as we America, can buy it. I also don't shive a get if the "owner" of the oil is a cruel despot who pulls the wings off flies for a hobby.
As loong as we (America) have easy access to cheap oil, the oil could come from under Lenin's Tomb or the Great Pyramids or greater downtown Manilla or downtown Hong Kong-you get my drift?

If the politicians backed off, the "oil producing nations" would work out the best solutions and I again would not shive a get from where or whose cheap oil we used.

Your seeing a conspiracy by "oil interests" clouds your thinking mainly because you ascribe a political meaning to everything. It also seems you hate "big business" which, for the most part, America is the big dog leading the pack...and that ain't all bad.
Rather us than any one of them.
(No the blind allegiance to profits by "big business" hurts us all. But in this oil thing, rather us than one of them).

Ed
I get it done with YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
shadywillowSat Jan-18-03 01:15 PM
Member since Aug 19th 2002
74 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#148. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 147)


          

WOW ......I had no idea that posting this would ignite such fiery arguments. I just wanna say that I have read your posts with great interest and open mindedness. I appreciate all that you guys had / have to say. I agree with some, and disagree with some. Your conversation has definately given me a lot to think about!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
AlSat Jan-18-03 04:28 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#150. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 148)


  

          

Btw, Lori...the audio is not the pilots. It is the gunners, target acquisition specialist and a ground controller.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
shadywillowSat Jan-18-03 04:53 PM
Member since Aug 19th 2002
74 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#151. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 150)


          

Yes, and that is what I found to be specifically interesting. It wasnt the visual images I found interesting. I found the sight of a person flying through the air as a result of an explosion to be upsetting even if it was to destroy enemy. Its still a human being, enemy or not. What I meant was...when I hear military personnel speak in the media, they always use language like " ground to air contact / communication".....a phrase like that. So to actually hear what was being said between the personnel ( I immediately thaought pilots )
I found to be interesting. I had the somewhat childish ( or sarcastic...whichever way you want to look at it) thought of someone at a switch in the aircraft saying something like " away!" when in reality there sounded like a couple of people making a collective effort to hit a target. Id never heard the actual language used between them so I thought that was the interesting part. At least I learned something I know ...I know....after a hundred and some posts, your probably thinking "SHE SHOULD HAVE JUST SAID THAT IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!"

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
shadywillowSat Jan-18-03 04:59 PM
Member since Aug 19th 2002
74 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#152. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 151)


          

:P
At least we kept Hal9000 and doctormidnight busy for a while...NOT!
}>

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
hal9000Sat Jan-18-03 08:41 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#153. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 152)


          

We never sleep...

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
EdGreeneSat Jan-18-03 09:40 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#155. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 152)


          

>
> At least we kept Hal9000 and doctormidnight busy for a
>while...NOT!
>}>

Shadywillow, thanks.

Maybe your observation was a litle off as to who was saying what, but now you know what actually goes on in real combat, as opposed to the "Hollywood" type of war.

The reason such situations are recorded is to help everyone understand and recreate what happened. In WWll, "friendly fire" is suspected of killing/wounding perhaps 1.7% of our own soldiers. Korea was a little better but Vietnam, even with better radios and inter-service cooperation, was worse.
We even lost a few in Kuwait to friendly fire.

Ed
I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
hal9000Sat Jan-18-03 10:45 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#156. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 155)
Sat Jan-18-03 10:48 PM

          

Four Canadians were killed and eight injured near Kandahar when US planes mistakenly bombed them. Then there was three Special Forces soldiers and seven Afghans north of Kandahar, they were killed when they called in an air strike on an enemy position. Then there were the Five U.S. soldiers who were wounded November 26 near Mazar-e Sharif by shrapnel from bombs dropped by an F/A-18C Hornet as it attacked an enemy position.

There was the downing of two US Army helicopters over Iraq by two US Air Force jets in April 1994. Nine British soldiers were killed by American friendly fire in the Gulf War. This is in addition to those Americans who have been recognised as being killed by their own side. The Washington Post, August, 14, 1991 reported that The Pentagon disclosed 35 of the 148 American servicemen and women who died on the battlefield in the Persian Gulf War were killed inadvertently by their comrades, an extraordinary proportion by historical standards and more than three times the number previously acknowledged.

There was a 17-percent fratricide rate in the Persian Gulf War. Fratricide incidents account for less that 2 percent of all casualties in battle in wars. Yet the US exceed that every time it goes into action.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
AlSun Jan-19-03 05:41 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#159. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 156)


  

          

That's because the enemy isn't very successful at inflicting casualties on us and our military is more lethal than any other on Earth. Your lack of understanding of what is involved shines through once again, HAL.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
doctormidnightThu May-22-03 01:52 AM
Charter member
11300 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy listClick to send message via AOL IM
#188. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 152)


  

          

Look, I found out what we can get ShadyWillow for her birthday.. wanna go halves on it, Hal?


Attachment #1, (jpg file)

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
hal9000Sun Jan-19-03 02:04 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#158. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 188)


          

Lol! No more sweet world around that spinning star.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
freespiritSun Jan-19-03 05:46 AM
Member since Mar 02nd 2002
1479 posts
Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#161. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to doctormidnight (Reply # 188)


          

and it was all...beep, beep, beep,...so I pushed it.


hahaha

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                            
hal9000Sun Jan-19-03 12:14 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#157. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 147)
Sun Jan-19-03 12:21 AM

          

Ed,

I like you. You're a well educated guy and in many respects I think we see the same things. The area you haven't appeared to ascribe much thought to is the spiritual realm. You have this "us against them" mentality. We are all interconnected and one day you're going to find all that out.

Politics affects every aspect of one's life. The decisions made by politicians affects everything on the planet, from the quality of the air you breath to the quality of the food you eat and who you buy it from. Since we no longer hunt our own food or make our own clothes, our survival is no longer directly affected by our personal decisions. And those who are suppose to be representing the people represent big business. And Democrats and Republicans are identical. When the rhetoric fades, the same old hacks--themselves slaves--have been purchased and sold to the highest bidder.

But more importantly, politics affects the way most people think about the world around them. And what many fail to consider is that American political decisions affect the quality of life for others on foreign soil and not for the better. Those decisions have not been motivated by the preservation of democracy like many believe, but rather the perpetuation of a capitalist system fueled by profit and greed and resulting in concentrated wealth to a few at the expense of the quality of life to the many. Now you may not shive a get about them because you're not one of them, but see, that's where you're wrong and I think people on some level know the truth which is why even guys like AL (who defends war) goes out of his way to help those ravaged by war--Al knows of the pain first hand, not that you don't.

What you see of capitalism is not the final culmination of political evolution, but a stage and it will pass like Rome. In the end Ed--and many people have been sent here to tell us this--love for one another will be the most powerful weapon. But as Labyrinth has pointed out, it seems it will creep by contagion.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
AlSun Jan-19-03 05:44 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#160. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 157)


  

          

HAL, Have you ever bothered to read Adam Smith? Try it.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                
EdGreeneSun Jan-19-03 08:50 AM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#162. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 157)


          

>Ed,
>
>I like you. You're a well educated guy and in many respects
>I think we see the same things. The area you haven't
>appeared to ascribe much thought to is the spiritual realm.
>You have this "us against them" mentality. We are all
>interconnected and one day you're going to find all that
>out.
>
>Politics affects every aspect of one's life. The decisions
>made by politicians affects everything on the planet, from
>the quality of the air you breath to the quality of the food
>you eat and who you buy it from. Since we no longer hunt our
>own food or make our own clothes, our survival is no longer
>directly affected by our personal decisions. And those who
>are suppose to be representing the people represent big
>business. And Democrats and Republicans are identical. When
>the rhetoric fades, the same old hacks--themselves
>slaves--have been purchased and sold to the highest bidder.
>
>But more importantly, politics affects the way most people
>think about the world around them. And what many fail to
>consider is that American political decisions affect the
>quality of life for others on foreign soil and not for the
>better. Those decisions have not been motivated by the
>preservation of democracy like many believe, but rather the
>perpetuation of a capitalist system fueled by profit and
>greed and resulting in concentrated wealth to a few at the
>expense of the quality of life to the many. Now you may not
>shive a get about them because you're not one of them, but
>see, that's where you're wrong and I think people on some
>level know the truth which is why even guys like AL (who
>defends war) goes out of his way to help those ravaged by
>war--Al knows of the pain first hand, not that you don't.
>
>What you see of capitalism is not the final culmination of
>political evolution, but a stage and it will pass like Rome.
>In the end Ed--and many people have been sent here to tell
>us this--love for one another will be the most powerful
>weapon. But as Labyrinth has pointed out, it seems it will
>creep by contagion.
__________________________

There is no where to go if you turn your back on capitalism. It is captialism that affords you the time to use the Internet, buy clothes, or rent a Blockbuster video/DVD. The economic engine that is Capitalism also provides for hundreds of millions here, and since we comsume so damn much we probably provide jobs for another 500 million people who depend on ust to keep buying like mindless apes with credit cards.

Capitalism kicks love's limp-wrist ass every time it gets a chance. You were right, I am neither spiritual or religious, as you supected.
"Love", as you envisage it, is so pure as to be unattainable by all but a few, usually intiates in some obscure religion or "peace and social justice" philospophy. That may be good gor you and others who beleive as you do. But you must remember it is we grunts who were there, hands on safeties, ready unlock our weapons and blow to hell any one who would come between you and the pracitce of your belief. Yeah, we beleive you have a right to beleive what you want, but don't thunk that crap makes you immune to poverty, or ostracism or hate or hunger.
It is capitalism that keeps the guns of we grunts loaded and F-16s fueled, ready to break thingand kill peole just to protect you and your "peace."

I hope lke hell you're right and we are wrong, that "peace" prevails. But that hope flies in the face of the reality of man's inhumanity to man.

The best thing about America coming out on top is just our presence in a region keeps war from happening. What tempers a lot of the really stupid governments these days is the real fear the US might invoke ecnomic santions on them. EVer notice how much bluster the Chinese have and how we just chill their sh*t by telling them we want to open talks on trade. But it is the guns of capitalism that lets us do what we do.

Ed
I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                    
hal9000Sun Jan-19-03 02:56 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#163. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 162)


          

Capitalists have destroyed whole societies. Self-sufficient people have been forcibly transformed into disfranchised wage workers. Indigenous communities and folk cultures have been replaced by mass-market, mass-media consumer societies. Cooperative lands have been supplanted by agribusiness and factory farms, villages by desolate shanty towns, autonomous regions by centralized autocracies.

People use to live contented lives in the rain forest. They hunted, fished and raised food. Their entire way of life was wiped out by a few giant companies that destroyed the rain forest in order to harvest the wood for profits. See, you equate things like Blockbuster video, The Thigh Master and Don Dupree's Money Making Package as advancement.

"Capitalism kicks love's limp-wrist ass every time it gets a chance." Yup, sure does...for now. And you're wrong about love. Love is attainable by all and love's presence is measured by how much of it you give away, not by how much you keep--completely contrary to a capitalist philosophy. Yes you're right, it's capitalism that keeps the guns and the grunts loaded and the F-16s fueled, ready to kill people. But when a man kills another man he kills part of himself. And that's not empty, religious bullshit! It's true! You'll find out; everyone will. Lasting peace can never be achieved through war and killing because tyrants always return, like Jason in Friday the 13th. It's not the tyrant that needs to be defeated, but rather what makes a man want to be a tyrant. When everyone refuses to fight, there'll be peace.

You know what capitalism produces in the inner city pal? Bangers who say: "You can't kill me I was born dead." It ties in to the Saudi Arabia terrorist thing. People really should listen to these things, it all counts and it's all a sign of what's happening around them. It's kind of like what Paul Simon said, "The words of the prophets are written on the subway walls and tenement halls...."

All these consumers you talk about are bonding with "things" Ed. Things are beginning to replace the warmth we once experienced from relationships with people. They're the walking dead. How much can you consume until you're happy; its like cocaine--you can't ever get enough. And then people wonder what their missing in life and why they're not happy.

You might want to reconsider the meaning of the word "advancement." I honestly don't know how advanced any of us can be: We keep killing ourselves, Earth (our life support system) is dying and after we all finish fighting over oil we'll be headed for Gene wars. Now the technology's available to own a human being from conception to birth. That's capitalism at it's best, isn't it? LOL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
shadywillowSun Jan-19-03 04:55 PM
Member since Aug 19th 2002
74 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#164. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 163)


          

<<But when a man kills another man he kills part of himself. And that's not empty, religious ! It's true! You'll find out; everyone will. Lasting peace can never be achieved through war and because tyrants always return, like Jason in Friday the 13th. >>

You are absolutely right on with that Hal. Although it is the way of the world and humanity.....so quit makin' fun of my sweet spinning star. I choose to see the beauty in this world until I move on to the next, and enjoy what I can, spiritually I mean, I dont have any money to blow on credit cards. World leaders are going to do what they want anyway and I am in reality just along for the ride. All the demonstrations today.......arent going to do a damn thing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
hal9000Sun Jan-19-03 06:30 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#166. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 164)
Sun Jan-19-03 06:31 PM

          

One can appreciate beauty and still have sympathy, compassion and understanding for others. Learning to laugh at yourself is free. If you can't laugh at yourself, your star will be viewed as a boring and permanent planet.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
AlSun Jan-19-03 06:17 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#165. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 163)
Sun Jan-19-03 06:20 PM

  

          

Read Guns, Germs and Steel, HAL.

"People use to live contented lives in the rain forest."

Bullshit. You ever lived in a rain forest? Are you one of the fools who thinks that Native Americans had an idilic lifestyle? You think people liked dying at 40, malnourished and barely surviving from year to year?



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
EdGreeneSun Jan-19-03 08:31 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#168. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 163)


          

>Capitalists have destroyed whole societies. Self-sufficient
>people have been forcibly transformed into disfranchised
>wage workers. Indigenous communities and folk cultures have
>been replaced by mass-market, mass-media consumer societies.
>Cooperative lands have been supplanted by agribusiness and
>factory farms, villages by desolate shanty towns, autonomous
>regions by centralized autocracies.

I agree. But we won't hold back time or man's expansion.

>People use to live contented lives in the rain forest. They
>hunted, fished and raised food. Their entire way of life was
>wiped out by a few giant companies that destroyed the rain
>forest in order to harvest the wood for profits. See, you
>equate things like Blockbuster video, The Thigh Master and
>Don Dupree's Money Making Package as advancement.

Tools of the capatilist's trade.

>
>"Capitalism kicks love's limp-wrist ass every time it gets a
>chance." Yup, sure does...for now. And you're wrong about
>love. Love is attainable by all and love's presence is
>measured by how much of it you give away, not by how much
>you keep--completely contrary to a capitalist philosophy.

Tell poor kids anywhere in the world that and they'll give you what is the local equivalent of the finger.

Until 2000, I spent two weeks or more every year in the back-alley, dirt-poor regions of the world as part of missionary work. It was when I realized the children in the village we had adopted were just as poor, just as sick, just as poorly nourished within days after we left that that "Love" rhetoric not only wore thin but wore out. I also realized another thing: "Love", as spouted by we missionaries, is self-serving, patting ourselves on the back bullshit. We give and gave it every year; every year that damn village sank deeper into oblivion.

>Yes you're right, it's capitalism that keeps the guns and
>the grunts loaded and the F-16s fueled, ready to kill
>people. But when a man kills another man he kills part of
>himself. And that's not empty, religious bullshit! It's
>true! You'll find out; everyone will. Lasting peace can
>never be achieved through war and killing because tyrants
>always return, like Jason in Friday the 13th. It's not the
>tyrant that needs to be defeated, but rather what makes a
>man want to be a tyrant. When everyone refuses to fight,
>there'll be peace.

Someone noted how Afghanistan was supposed to be peaceful after the defeat of the Soviets. What happened? Religious fanatics became more oppressive than the Soviets. The "religious fanatics? The friggin' Taliban.

>You know what capitalism produces in the inner city pal?
>Bangers who say: "You can't kill me I was born dead." It
>ties in to the Saudi Arabia terrorist thing. People really
>should listen to these things, it all counts and it's all a
>sign of what's happening around them. It's kind of like what
>Paul Simon said, "The words of the prophets are written on
>the subway walls and tenement halls...."

Err..."Racism" produced the inner city, not capitalism.
>
>All these consumers you talk about are bonding with "things"
>Ed. Things are beginning to replace the warmth we once
>experienced from relationships with people. They're the
>walking dead. How much can you consume until you're happy;
>its like cocaine--you can't ever get enough. And then people
>wonder what their missing in life and why they're not happy.
>
>You might want to reconsider the meaning of the word
>"advancement." I honestly don't know how advanced any of us
>can be: We keep killing ourselves, Earth (our life support
>system) is dying and after we all finish fighting over oil
>we'll be headed for Gene wars. Now the technology's
>available to own a human being from conception to birth.
>That's capitalism at it's best, isn't it? LOL!

Life (the entirety of it) is a fundamental thing: one biological system murdering another and for nothing else other than "Lebensraum."
And I agree: man...err...humankind is the most murderous, most ruthless, most barbarous biological system in the universe.
But you don't REALLY expect us to give away that advantage, or do you?
You see, "life" (as we know it as sentient beings), once stripped of its philosophical bullshit, is worse than "dog eat dog", its "dog will knaw off its own foot if its trapped and sees no way out" kind of world. And yes, as a single-minded biological system, we're even worse than mindless, equally efficient Cancer.
Hell, Cancer, because it has no mind, thus no conscious, nor an awareness of its eventual fate once its host dies, itself dies after killing its host.
We're worse because we (humankind) know the outcome but still we keep up our murderous, mindless behavior.

"Love", as you preach it, has had about 2,000 years to change the world. "Love", as you preach it, should have made some inroads into man's seemingly mindless, evil behavior. It has not and it will not. Why? Because "Love,” offers no sustenance, no shelter, no food, no real hope.

That is why "Love", as you preach it, loses out to capitalism:
"Love" offers the poor the weak, the defenseless some silent "company" while they suffer and die.

Here's a taste of reality-Ed style: all the while I traveled as a missionary, I KNEW the oppressive heat and bugs would go away in a week or two. Even as a grunt, I knew if I lived, the heat and bugs would go away.

I am not, repeat not-dammnit, a "captalist" but I'll be damned if I'll ever go back to using dial up Internet service. Nor am I likely to give up any one of my 3 (overindulgent) meals a day for one of those kids in our adopted village.
Neither are you, at least not more than a week or two each year.

Ed
I get it done with my YAHOO-DSL!


  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
hal9000Mon Jan-20-03 02:13 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#171. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 168)


          

Until 2000, I spent two weeks or more every year in the back-alley, dirt-poor regions of the world as part of missionary work. It was when I realized the children in the village we had adopted were just as poor, just as sick, just as poorly nourished within days after we left that that "Love" rhetoric not only wore thin but wore out. I also realized another thing: "Love", as spouted by we missionaries, is self- serving, patting ourselves on the back bullshit. We give and gave it every year; every year that damn village sank deeper into oblivion.

They laugh at all that phony Christianity bullshit. They know it's self-serving. So it wasn't love you gave them at all, it was an attempt to convert so-called barbarians to the way of the so-called "civilized world." They don't need or want you to intervene, they need and want you and Imperialist America to stay away!

Someone noted how Afghanistan was supposed to be peaceful after the defeat of the Soviets. What happened? Religious fanatics became more oppressive than the Soviets. The "religious fanatics? The friggin' Taliban.

Come on! President Carter authorized the CIA to funnel money to Afghan rebels as early as 1980 through Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence. The Taliban came to power with the help if the CIA. So then the CIA backed Taliban began oppressing women and committing massive human rights violation--just as brutal as the Soviets.

Err..."Racism" produced the inner city, not capitalism.

Capitalism has it's roots in England during the industrial revolution. While it was Spain and the Dutch that introduced slavery to America, American colonists began trading slaves in Jamestown less than twenty years after the birth of the first American colony. The very first colony in America was founded to extract profits for an english company from the farming of tobacco in America for export to England. America was built from the sweet and blood of slaves and it's original native people were annihilated.

Life (the entirety of it) is a fundamental thing: one biological system murdering another and for nothing else other than "Lebensraum."

In nature, different species compete with each other not for the acquisition and accumulation of wealth and real estate, but for day to day survival. I take it back, you're not as educated as I thought.

You see, "life" (as we know it as sentient beings), once stripped of its philosophical bullshit, is worse than "dog eat dog", its "dog will knaw off its own foot if its trapped and sees no way out" kind of world.

Bullshit. European expansion was not fueled by hunger or lack of space but by conquest for its own sake. Those who annihilated the Aztecs, the Incas, and the North American Indian, did so not because they ran out of space but because they sought to expand, control and dominate. Columbus ministered the slaughter and enslaving of the indigenous peoples of Central and South America, including the indigenous inhabitants on the islands of Haiti, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Jamaica, the Antilles and the Bahamas. And yet he was welcomed with open arms by the Arawak Indians when he first arrived.

"Love", as you preach it, has had about 2,000 years to change the world. "Love", as you preach it, should have made some inroads into man's seemingly mindless, evil behavior. It has not and it will not. Why? Because "Love,” offers no sustenance, no shelter, no food, no real hope.

It is self-determination that offers shelter from the cold, It is greed and the lack of love that prevents others from achieving it.

That is why "Love", as you preach it, loses out to capitalism:
"Love" offers the poor the weak, the defenseless some silent "company" while they suffer and die.


Love offers knowledge and education freely to teach others that they need not be victims and that there's no need to suffer and die. Those who truly love, teach others to believe in themselves; to become self reliant and fight for their own freedom.

I am not, repeat not-dammnit, a "captalist" but I'll be damned if I'll ever go back to using dial up Internet service. Nor am I likely to give up any one of my 3 (overindulgent) meals a day for one of those kids in our adopted village. Neither are you, at least not more than a week or two each year.

What makes you think you have to give something up so that others might be able to enjoy what it is they desire. Keep your broadband, just stay out of foreign countries deluding yourself that that's somehow protecting and giving you better cable reception...Mr. Tough Guy.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
AlMon Jan-20-03 04:35 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#173. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 171)


  

          

HAL, you really have a twisted view of the world and of history, don't you?



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
EdGreeneMon Jan-20-03 03:01 PM
Member since Jan 14th 2003
2649 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#183. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 171)


          

>What makes you think you have to give something up so that
>others might be able to enjoy what it is they desire. Keep
>your broadband, just stay out of foreign countries deluding
>yourself that that's somehow protecting and giving you
>better cable reception...Mr. Tough Guy.

I see how you think HAL: when I disagree with you, (which I don't in the main), I'm no longer as smart as you orginally thought. I did not digress when addressing your points, but you pointedly refuse to directly address any of mine, choosing instead to spout more of your philosophy. You have even taken my speaking without obfuscation in my posts as a sign I am some cold heartless human. What I am and have been on this and every topic where I choose to participate, is brutally honest, with no politics or fear of censure clouding my statements.

I spoke of my missionary experiences and you chose to denigrate me and them. Had you actually read and understood my missionary statements, you would have discovered we said nearly the same thing, and for the same reasons.
But I've noticed you don't actually read posts. You scan them to find points of disagreement.

After you ran out of thoughts, you stooped to name-calling:
("Mr. Tough Guy.")

Pity.

I get it done with YAHOO-DSL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
hal9000Mon Jan-20-03 06:06 PM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#184. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to EdGreene (Reply # 183)


          

Is this the same EdGreen as before...or his sissy twin? You come in here walking the walk and talking the talk like Jack Webb--the toughest of the tough-guy Drill Instructors and now you're whining and sniffling with ten dollar words like Dr. Zachary Smith in Lost in Space. If we said nearly the same things regarding your missionary experiences...then what's the problem?

Is this the same tough guy who spoke of the slackers, ner'-do-wells, lazy, shiftless, drug-taking youth whose only goal is to score some dope and play electronic games online? The same tough guy who spoke of that pitiful and pitiable bunch that this country has to look forward to for leadership and workers? The same tough guy that said those slackers are what will eventually bring this country to its knees? The same tough guy who said today's youth neither toil nor spin and are a whole generation of people who have no skills, no purpose, no direction and have limited if any values and like MP3s more than they like or use books? Are you really the same guy who said that almost without exception, any one of those valueless, worthless, pampered slackers couldn't come close to being worth the pus in the pimple on a good man's ass?

Are you that same brutally honest tough guy? You're kidding right? Is Alan Funt going to be bursting in here to tell me we're on Candid Camera? Because if he's not, I'm surprised that after all that brutal honesty you vomited on everyone that now your whining about me spouting out a little of my philosophy? Welcome to the real world. Welcome to the brutal, cold, "dog eat dog" world you espouse to be such a champion of. Welcome to the "biological system murdering another...for nothing else other than "Lebensraum" world that you claim we all better learn to live in.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                        
AlMon Jan-20-03 06:36 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#185. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 184)


  

          

HAL, really...you do watch too much TV and movies...



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                        
MykSun Jan-19-03 09:49 PM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#170. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 163)


  

          

I live in a suburb. I still hunt and grow a major majority of my food.
Capitalism doesn't produce the gang bangers, half-assed attempts to mix Socialism with Capitalism is what produces them.

I think if you ever had your way (at least one of your ways) that without war the only way we would have peace is to give into the tyrants and live under their oppression. Even then it's not a peaceful life if you are one of the ones they want dead and even if they succeed in killing off one group they will start looking for another to kill off. That is what they do, they are tyrants.

You are searching for Utopia. The problem is that Utopia is a personal opinion. Your view of Utopia is not the same view of Utopia as what Hitler held. Without war it is the Hitler's who force their version on everyone else.

I think if you checked a little harder you will find that rain forests are not wiped out and that the reason they are being cut down is not because of lumber but for the raising of food. It is not giant lumber companies doing the major damage but small ranchers. They doze and burn, the land quickly burns out so they doze and burn some more.
The loggers go in and find that million dollar tree and remove it. Other than roads it does them no good to clear cut a rain forest. There is too much of a garbage tree to money tree ratio for them to make money clear cutting (which is why the ranchers doze and burn).
In US non-rain forest some clear cutting is good. A long time ago we decided fire bad. Now we are discovering that fire good. But we still have the attitude that we have to stop forest fires. The environmentalist have put a stop to much of the clear cutting which used to serve as fire breaks. Put the two together and you have the worst forest fires this country has ever seen.
If you would check you would also find that a young activly growing tree produces more oxygen than a large old growth tree. And that the psuedo-conservationist do nature more harm than good almost everytime they get their way, look at cleaned up crude spills compared to spills where the oil was retrieved and nature was allowed to clean it.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                            
hal9000Mon Jan-20-03 04:10 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#172. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Myk (Reply # 170)
Mon Jan-20-03 04:15 AM

          



I'm suggesting that in the long run, the solution to tyranny is in addressing what motivates men to become a tyrant. Killing the tyrant is only a temporary solution. That's why capital punishment doesn't stop people from murdering. If it did, no one would ever commit a homicide in a state with capital punishment.

You are searching for Utopia. The problem is that Utopia is a personal opinion. Your view of Utopia is not the same view of Utopia as what Hitler held. Without war it is the Hitler's who force their version on everyone else.

There is no utopia and never will be. Finding out the cause of what makes a Hitler is far more important. Removing cancer is a bandaid, what causes cancer is the key.

I think if you checked a little harder you will find that rain forests are not wiped out and that the reason they are being cut down is not because of lumber but for the raising of food. It is not giant lumber companies doing the major damage but small ranchers. They doze and burn, the land quickly burns out so they doze and burn some more.

I think if you bothered to check at all, you'd find that what you say is utter nonsense!

Rainforests are being destroyed because the value of rainforest land is perceived as only the value of its timber by short-sighted governments, multi-national logging companies, and land owners. The latest statistics show that rainforest land converted to cattle operations yields the land owner $60 per acre and if timber is harvested, the land is worth $400 per acre. Most rainforests are cleared by chainsaws, bulldozers and fires for its timber value and then are followed by farming and ranching operations, even by world giants like Mitsubishi Corporation, Gerogia Pacific, Texaco and Unocal.

And regarding ranchers, cattle is one of the most wasteful and inefficient uses of land for food known to man. Do the research. Raising cattle wastes grain and water and contaminates the land and underground water table.

Additionally, you're not taking into consideration that nearly half of the world's species of plants, animals and microorganisms will be destroyed or severely threatened over the next quarter century due to Rainforest deforestation. The absence of those species will adversely affect the delicate eco system in the area and on the planet. The Brazilian Government has released new figures which show that the destruction of the Amazon rainforest is accelerating again. According to official statistics, an area of more than 60,000 km - twice the size of Belgium - was cut down, burned and cleared between 1995 and 1996. There were an estimated ten million Indians living in the Amazonian Rainforest five centuries ago. Today there are less than 200,000.

look at cleaned up crude spills compared to spills where the oil was retrieved and nature was allowed to clean it.

This is one of the stupidest things you've ever said here. Oil spills wouldn't exist at all if elite corporations weren't bent on making us dependent on it to maintain their profits. We wouldn't even need oil if we'd had spent the necessary money to research and convert to wind and solar. Why do think we haven't done that? Might be a little harder to charge a consumer for the use of the sun and air.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
AlMon Jan-20-03 04:39 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#174. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 172)
Mon Jan-20-03 04:45 AM

  

          

HAL, why don't you become a psychiatrist and do some research? At least then you would be doing something.

Oh, and HAL? 500 years ago, most people were living in an agricultural situation. Not true today, anywhere. Your BS about the number of people who live in the rainforest is a statistic with no meaning unless you are willing to look at such factors as life expectency, diet, disease, etc. Or maybe you would like to live in the rainforest and deal with a life expectency of 40 years? Protein deficiency in your children? Malaria? Beri Beri? Dengue Fever?



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
hal9000Mon Jan-20-03 04:45 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#175. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 174)


          

LOL!

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                        
AlMon Jan-20-03 05:04 AM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#176. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 175)


  

          

Well, HAL, if you think that is so funny, maybe a talk with a friend of mine is in order. Her name is Nancy C. Andreasen. You can look her up. She is doing something.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
hal9000Mon Jan-20-03 05:19 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#177. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Al (Reply # 176)


          

What do you think I do with my days, sit around and wait for the next debate? I'm writing a novel. I keep pretty busy. Every now and then I feel like getting my ass kicked so for a good laugh I come over to see how much pain I can endure.

"Can there be anything more splendid than to put the whole world into commotion by a few arguments"

--Voltaire



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                
MykMon Jan-20-03 05:29 AM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#178. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 172)


  

          

You want to address and fix what makes a tyrant? Sounds to me like you want to do a bit of your own brain washing. It's bad is someone wants to control people in a manner they see fit, but it's perfectly OK for you to control someone in the manner you want.

My religion is full of psuedo-conservationist like you. People who don't bother to check into things for themselves. People who want to claim they love nature but can't be bothered to actually learn about it or live in it.
You buy into what you are told because the people who are telling you those things are telling you what you want to hear.

I also know from dealing with the psuedo-conservationists in my religion that there is nothing I can tell you to convince you otherwise. You think you know that there is no natural crude seepage. You think you know that crude can only be cleaned up by man. Even if I gave you the facts you would say they were lies. Even if you were to go to Alaska and/or the Valdez spill area and see for yourself you would come up with some conspiracy to shrug it off.

You were told that loggers are bad so you buy into anything that says that. But just in case I am right, cows are now heavy polluters.

I'm sure there are clear cutting loggers in the SA rainforests, I'm not making a blanket statement like you are prone to do. But I've seen reports and films of both going on. I searched out these reports from unbiased sources, which is something you don't seem prone to do.

It's not only wise to question authority, it's wise to question those who are questioning authority.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                    
hal9000Mon Jan-20-03 05:38 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#179. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Myk (Reply # 178)


          

You want to address and fix what makes a tyrant? Sounds to me like you want to do a bit of your own brain washing. It's bad is someone wants to control people in a manner they see fit, but it's perfectly OK for you to control someone in the manner you want.

Hey Myk...get a hold yourself, I never proposed a solution. I clearly suggested only to explore the issue. I think you gotta real proplem with trying to put words into people's mouths. Re-read my post and show me where I ever suggested "fixing what makes a tryant."

I'll be waiting.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                        
MykMon Jan-20-03 08:23 AM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#180. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 179)


  

          

I'm sorry, I thought you were proposing a solution.
So what you are proposing is to allow the tyrants free reign to do what ever they want while you explore the reason they happen.


--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
hal9000Mon Jan-20-03 09:10 AM
Member since Jan 21st 2002
3876 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#181. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to Myk (Reply # 180)
Mon Jan-20-03 09:12 AM

          

No, that's not what I propose. I'm suggesting that we need to understand what makes a tyrant a tryant. And I'm not talking about the obvious reasons like greed and power. What lies behind that? What are your thoughts?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
MykMon Jan-20-03 10:45 AM
Charter member
7491 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#182. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 181)


  

          

Many different reasons. Same as a school yard bully.

And many times with a real tyrant it's all of the different reasons. They want power and they want to keep it, they're mentally ill, they are just mean.
Sometimes it's cultural. They may not know anything else and it's been going on so long that it keeps getting worse with each successor.

I don't think there is any simple answer as to why or simple fix.

I think an easier answer would be why to people put up with it. That one would probably be easier to use to bring about a fix.

--------------
History teaches us that history has taught us nothing.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                            
AlMon Jan-20-03 06:40 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#187. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 181)


  

          

Met any tyrants, HAL? Or are you basing your ideas on TV shows and movies?



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

                                                                        
AlMon Jan-20-03 06:39 PM
Charter member
11790 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#186. "RE: Video of Gunship Targeting Afghanistan"
In response to hal9000 (Reply # 179)


  

          

"I never proposed a solution"

Always the critic, never the one who addresses the problems or finds solutions...



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

giddyrigSun Jan-19-03 08:54 PM
Member since Apr 04th 2002
1684 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#169. "Is it a video or just Audio?"
In response to shadywillow (Reply # 0)


          

All I get is audio... I have Windows Mediaplayer9, but no visual footage at all on this one. Maybe my connection is too slow? Don't know why it doesn't work right.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

Top The PC Q&A Forum Off-Topic Lounge topic #12966 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.27
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com
Home
Links
About PCQandA
Link To Us
Support PCQandA
Privacy Policy
In Memoriam
Acceptable Use Policy

Have a question or problem regarding this forum? Check here for the answer.