For every question, there's an answer -- and you'll find it here!


Printer-friendly copy
Top The PC Q&A Forum The Computer Forum topic #120964
View in linear mode

Subject: "ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?" Previous topic | Next topic
DocFri Aug-09-02 04:33 PM
Charter member
2749 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
"ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?"


  

          

I have been thinking about making the switch to ZA 3.1. However, I want all your opinions about that, good and bad. Something in the back of my mind is telling me to stay where I am with 2.x because it does stop far more e-mail virus scripts (even though it was only suppose to stop one type). Is 3.1 that much better? Is it worth losing the e-mail protection? If you have NAV 2002, do you even need the e-mail protection that 2.x provides?

Thank-you,

- Jeff

What do you mean he's the Doctor? Doctor Who?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

Replies to this topic
Subject Author Message Date ID
RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?
Aug 09th 2002
1
RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?
Aug 09th 2002
2
RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?
Aug 09th 2002
3
RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?
Aug 10th 2002
4
RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?
Aug 10th 2002
5
RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?
Aug 11th 2002
6

billyboybFri Aug-09-02 04:53 PM
Member since Mar 17th 2002
707 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#1. "RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?"
In response to Doc (Reply # 0)


          

dell 8100 pentium 4 1.3 gigs
windows M.E.
256 mb rdram p.c.800.
nav 2002
internet explorer 6.0
road runner

hi jeff, although i can't answer your specific question, i also felt as you, and was undecided on what to do, so i did it, and the bottom line was i had to reformat and reinstall windows after the download because it was something i found out later that i didn't do first. and that was to turn off true vector first, although i know it probulary was my fault that i had the problems i had, and also i believe zone alarm is a good firewall, with that said, i became spooked with zone alarm, and am afraid to download it again, just something in my head, so i went with sygate instead and feel okay about it. so if you update don't forget about turning off true vector first.

good luck, billy.



  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

KJTFri Aug-09-02 05:00 PM
Charter member
15901 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#2. "RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?"
In response to Doc (Reply # 0)
Fri Aug-09-02 05:02 PM

  

          

I don't have a need for the "improvements" and didn't upgrade. The 2.6.xxx version works perfectly well.

Jim.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

    
R2Fri Aug-09-02 06:32 PM
Charter member
1129 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#3. "RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?"
In response to KJT (Reply # 2)
Fri Aug-09-02 06:35 PM

  

          

You are correct about the email protection. ZoneLabs erroneously made ZA free's MailSafe protect you against 37 different email attachment file types. That protection persisted through the 2.6.362 version. However, with the 3x version they will strip away all file types except .vbs.

Unless you feel a compelling reason to upgrade, I would recommend staying with the 2.6.362 version.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

ShellySat Aug-10-02 06:02 AM
Charter member
58338 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#4. "RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?"
In response to Doc (Reply # 0)


  

          

I would prefer version 3.1. NAV is all the mail protection you need.

Shelly

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

Randellx5Sat Aug-10-02 06:13 AM
Member since Apr 18th 2002
1788 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#5. "RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?"
In response to Doc (Reply # 0)


          

>> NAV is all the mail protection you need.

My preference is the same. ZA recommends not using their 'mailsafe' option with something like the NAV email download protection feature. I've always chosen to use NAV and disable the feature in ZA. I recently went from ZA pro 2x to ZA Plus 3x, and I prefer the later version. Haven't had a single problem with it.

Randell

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

DocSun Aug-11-02 06:28 PM
Charter member
2749 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#6. "RE: ZoneAlarm 2.x or 3.1?"
In response to Doc (Reply # 0)
Sun Aug-11-02 06:29 PM

  

          

Hello everyone,

I considered everyone's opinions and I decided to uninstall ZA 2.6, turn on NAV 2002's script protection, and install ZA 3.1. All is working as it should.

ZA's new layout will take some getting used to; but, it shouldn't be too tough.

Thank-you everyone,

- Jeff

What do you mean he's the Doctor? Doctor Who?

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | | Top

Top The PC Q&A Forum The Computer Forum topic #120964 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.27
Copyright 1997-2003 DCScripts.com
Home
Links
About PCQandA
Link To Us
Support PCQandA
Privacy Policy
In Memoriam
Acceptable Use Policy

Have a question or problem regarding this forum? Check here for the answer.