Are you saying that if someone clubs a military person they can't get charged with damaging govt property, the same as if they took the bat to a military vehicle? I was even under the impression that if someone in the military tried to harm themselves they could be charged with damaging govt property. But a lot of military people like to blow smoke out of their butts, so it's hard to say whether or not I (and those I asked today) was (are) being lied to.

I'm not surprised the govt doesn't find against the govt about the draft being illegal.
They want to have a draft, they will have a draft. The 1st has been ignored enough. I certainly am not allowed to bear arms. The 4th was thrown out the window by the Supreme Court. They don't want to follow the 5th Amendment, so they ruled it doesn't apply. The 6th has been overruled in favor of "victim's rights". It's fairly common for the 7th to be tread upon. The 9th and 10th have never been followed. The 8th depends on which way the wind is blowing for punishment and I think $25,000 is excessive for putting the wrong gas in your car.

Was anyone charged for Ruby Ridge? What happened to the State who decided to take action on Ruby Ridge because the Fed's were covering it up? The solicitor general argued that "federal law enforcement agents are privileged to do what would otherwise be unlawful if done by a private citizen." The state didn't buy that so the feds dragged their feet until they could get a friendly in charge who dropped the criminal case.
Was anyone charged for shooting Esequiel Hernandez Jr.? Following orders? Then why aren't those in command in prison?
Where is Calley today? I'll give you a hint, running a jewelery store in the US is a far cry from serving time for war crimes in Vietnam.

Nope, I'm not surprised at all that the govt has not and never will find that the 13th doesn't apply to themselves. It only applies to the chickens and the goats, because some animals are more equal than others.