>It doesn't really matter from which column you read your
>data, Microsoft Antispyware still uses alot of resources. ;)

Respectfully "Agree to Disagree" .. Even the users on CNET were commenting how lite on resources the GIANT AntiSpyware product was. That is one reason I purchased it {before MS acquired the Company}. My Norton AntiVirus uses a heck of a lot more resources than the MS AntiSpyware does !!

Obviously no one is forced to use the product if they see no need for it, I mean, after all, it is completely FREE to Windows {2K/XP} users .. hehe .. I have posted evidence to the contrary: For anyone with enough resources to run XP {the operating systm} to begin with, this neat little tool will hardly tax their system.

SpywareBlaster and common sense work well for you, that's fine. But why invest so much time trying to debunk and cast doubt on this excellent product? If you see no need for it, fine .. but let others draw their own conclusions based on the evidence.

I agree with Shelly's initial assessment, this is an excellent tool being offered by MS for free.

:-) :clap: :evilgrin: :lol: :)